Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25579207›Full record

ArticleChemistry & biology2015

Detection of intestinal cancer by local, topical application of a quenched fluorescence probe for cysteine cathepsins.

Ehud Segal, Tyler R Prestwood, Wouter A van der Linden, Yaron Carmi, Nupur Bhattacharya, Nimali Withana, Martijn Verdoes, Aida Habtezion, Edgar G Engleman, Matthew Bogyo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry & biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Advances in laboratory medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ehud SegalDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Tyler R PrestwoodDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Wouter A van der LindenDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Yaron CarmiDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Nupur BhattacharyaDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Nimali WithanaDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Martijn VerdoesDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Aida HabtezionDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Edgar G EnglemanDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Matthew BogyoDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: mbogyo@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007365 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHUA, KATRIN F · 1985 to 2021
$33.8M
Small Molecule Imaging of Protease ActivityR01EB005011 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BOGYO, MATTHEW · 2005 to 2013
$3.0M
Biology and Immunology of Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells in a Novel Mouse ModelU01CA141468 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ENGLEMAN, EDGAR G. · 2009 to 2013
$2.4M
Radiotherapy as Immunotherapy of TumorsR01CA163441 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STROBER, SAMUEL · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS 1 R01 CA163441NCI NIH HHS CA141468NCI NIH HHS R01 CA163441NCI NIH HHS U01 CA141468NIBIB NIH HHS EB005011NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB005011NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007365NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM007365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of colonic polyps can prevent up to 90% of colorectal cancer deaths. Conventional colonoscopy readily detects the majority of premalignant lesions, which exhibit raised morphology. However, lesions that are flat and depressed are often undetected using this method. Therefore, there is a need for molecular-based contrast agents to improve detection rates over conventional colonoscopy. We evaluated a quenched fluorescent activity-based probe (qABP; BMV109) that targets multiple cysteine cathepsins that are overexpressed in intestinal dysplasia in a genetic model of spontaneous intestinal polyp formation and in a chemically induced model of colorectal carcinoma. We found that the qABP selectively targets cysteine cathepsins, resulting in high sensitivity and specificity for intestinal tumors in mice and humans. Additionally, the qABP can be administered by either intravenous injection or by local delivery to the colon, making it a highly valuable tool for improved detection of colorectal lesions using fluorescence-guided colonoscopy.

Indexed as

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli ProteinAnimalsCarbocyaninesCatalytic DomainCathepsinsColonoscopyDisease Models, AnimalFluorescent DyesHumansImmunohistochemistryIntestinal NeoplasmsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPolypsSensitivity and SpecificityAdenomatous Polyposis Coli ProteinCarbocyaninesCathepsinscyanine dye 5Fluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID25579207
PMCPMC4353655
OpenAlexW1967278694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.