ArticleScientific reports2015
3D-printed microfluidic device for the detection of pathogenic bacteria using size-based separation in helical channel with trapezoid cross-section.
Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 83 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
83 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microfluidic-assisted metal nanoparticle synthesis: emerging trends toward optical sensing applications.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Simple-Flow: A 3D-Printed Multiwell Flow Plate to Coculture Primary Human Lung Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- BacteSign: Building a Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) Database for Universal Bacterial Identification.Biosensors · 2024Article
- 3D Printing Technology: Role in Safeguarding Food Security.Analytical chemistry · 2024Review
- A 3D printed sheath flow interface for surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) detection in flow.The Analyst · 2024Article
- Fabrication of a Microfluidic Test Device with a 3D Printer and Its Combination with the Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method to DetectMicromachines · 2024Article
- 3D-printed microfluidic device for high-throughput production of lipid nanoparticles incorporating SARS-CoV-2 spike protein mRNA.Lab on a chip · 2024Article
- Challenges for Field-Effect-Transistor-Based Graphene Biosensors.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Emerging Advances in Microfluidic Hydrogel Droplets for Tissue Engineering and STEM Cell Mechanobiology.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A review on inertial microfluidic fabrication methods.Biomicrofluidics · 2023Review
- Computer-aided engineering and additive manufacturing for bioreactors in tissue engineering: State of the art and perspectives.Biophysics reviews · 2023Review
- Centrifugation-Assisted Three-Dimensional Printing of Devices Embedded with Fully Enclosed Microchannels.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2023Article
- Establishment of a Perfusion Process with Antibody-Producing CHO Cells Using a 3D-Printed Microfluidic Spiral Separator with Web-Based Flow Control.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- 3D printing in biotechnology-An insight into miniaturized and microfluidic systems for applications from cell culture to bioanalytics.Engineering in life sciences · 2022Review
- Vancomycin-conjugated polydopamine-coated magnetic nanoparticles for molecular diagnostics of Gram-positive bacteria in whole blood.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2022Article
- Overcoming Multidrug Resistance of Antibiotics via Nanodelivery Systems.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Emerging Technologies and Materials for High-Resolution 3D Printing of Microfluidic Chips.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2022Article
- Multiplexed detection and differentiation of bacterial enzymes and bacteria by color-encoded sensor hydrogels.Bioactive materials · 2021Article
- Recent advances in magnetic nanoparticle-based microfluidic devices for the pretreatment of pathogenic bacteria.Biomedical engineering letters · 2021Review
- Rapid synchronized fabrication of vascularized thermosets and composites.Nature communications · 2021Article
23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A facile method has been developed to detect pathogenic bacteria using magnetic nanoparticle clusters (MNCs) and a 3D-printed helical microchannel. Antibody-functionalized MNCs were used to capture E. coli (EC) bacteria in milk, and the free MNCs and MNC-EC complexes were separated from the milk using a permanent magnet. The free MNCs and MNC-EC complexes were dispersed in a buffer solution, then the solution was injected into a helical microchannel device with or without a sheath flow. The MNC-EC complexes were separated from the free MNCs via the Dean drag force and lift force, and the separation was facilitated in the presence of a sheath flow. The concentration of the E. coli bacteria was determined using a light absorption spectrometer, and the limit of detection was found to be 10 cfu/mL in buffer solution and 100 cfu/mL in milk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.