ArticleClinical drug investigation2015
Omalizumab for difficult-to-treat dermatological conditions: clinical and immunological features from a retrospective real-life experience.
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Benefits and Harms of Omalizumab Treatment in Adolescent and Adult Patients With Chronic Idiopathic (Spontaneous) Urticaria: A Meta-analysis of "Real-world" Evidence.JAMA dermatology · 2019Pooled it
- Review on the Application of Biologic Factors in Atopic Dermatitis and Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.Dermatology research and practice · 2026Review
- Off-label use of Baricitinib improves moderate and severe atopic dermatitis in China through inhibiting MAPK and PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway via targeting JAK-STAT signaling of CD4Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Cytokine Profiles of Chronic Urticaria Patients and The Effect of Omalizumab Treatment.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2023Article
- Omalizumab: An Optimal Choice for Patients with Severe Allergic Asthma.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Prevalence, Clinical Manifestations, Treatment, and Clinical Course of Chronic Urticaria in Elderly: A Systematic Review.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2022Review
- Targeting immunoglobulin E in atopic dermatitis: A review of the existing evidence.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2021Review
- Omalizumab Updosing in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: an Overview of Real-World Evidence.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2020Review
- Effects of omalizumab therapy on peripheral nerve functions: short observational study.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2019Article
- Biological therapies for atopic dermatitis: An update.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2019Review
- Omalizumab an effective and safe alternative therapy in severe refractory atopic dermatitis: A case report.Medicine · 2018Article
- Systemic Treatment of Adult Atopic Dermatitis: A Review.Dermatology and therapy · 2017Review
- A review of omalizumab for the management of severe asthma.Drug design, development and therapy · 2016Review
- Shifting Focus in the Therapeutics of Immunobullous Disease.Indian journal of dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOmalizumab, a therapeutic monoclonal antibody specific for human IgE, has thus far been used as add-on therapy for moderate-to-severe allergic asthma in adults and children.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to test omalizumab efficacy in other conditions in which the IgE-mast cell axis is supposed to play a role.
methodsNine patients with dermatological manifestations possibly related to activation of the IgE-mast cell axis (six chronic spontaneous urticaria and three atopic dermatitis patients) were administered off-label omalizumab because of refractoriness to standard therapy. All patients were subjected to strict clinical, laboratoristic, and imaging follow-up to monitor for possible adverse effects. In addition, to further assess the role of omalizumab on T cells, mast cells, and eosinophils, T-cell immune polarisation as well as eosinophil cationic protein and tryptase serum levels were determined before and during omalizumab administration.
resultsTherapy was effective in seven out of nine patients (six complete responses, one partial response, and two no responses). Interestingly, omalizumab appeared to induce lymphocyte polarisation toward a type 2 immune response and to be able to quench eosinophil-mediated inflammation, particularly in atopic dermatitis patients. Tryptase serum levels were generally low and remained unchanged during omalizumab treatment. Despite treatment spanning over several years in most of the patients, no adverse effects nor new ensuing medical conditions have thus far been observed (median follow-up: 42 months).
conclusionsOff-label omalizumab was safe and effective in our patients. The novel immunologic features recorded in our patients add further complexity to the mechanism of action of omalizumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.