Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25578739›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2015

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the survival outcomes of first-line treatment options in high-risk prostate cancer.

Jun H Lei, Liang R Liu, Qiang Wei, Shi B Yan, Tu R Song, Fu S Lin, Lu Yang, De H Cao, Hai C Yuan, Wen B Xue and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Update on PSMA-based Prostate Cancer Imaging.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Image-Guided Prostate Cryoablation: State-of-the-Art.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Magnetic Resonance-Guided Prostate Ablation.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jun H LeiDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Liang R LiuDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Qiang WeiDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Shi B YanDepartment of Urology, Dujiangyan Medical Center/ the affiliated hospital of Chengdu University, Dujianyan, China.
Tu R SongDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Fu S LinDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Lu YangDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
De H CaoDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hai C YuanDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wen B XueDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiao LvDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ying C CaiDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hao ZengDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ping HanDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNChengdu University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-dermatologic cancer in the western countries in western countries. High-risk PCa accounts for 15% of the diagnosed cases. In this study, we compare the long-term survival outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP), radiation therapy (RT), brachytherapy (BT), androgen- deprivation therapy (ADT), and watchful waiting (WW) in high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Overall, RP/(RT plus ADT) gave the best survival outcome in patients with high-risk PCa, whereas ADT/WW had the worst outcome. The overall priority for treatment strategy could be ranked as follows: RP/(RT plus ADT), RT, and ADT/WW. RP had significant better overall survival (OS) than RT or BT, and RP had significant lower cancer-specific mortality (CSM) than RT (0.51 [95% CI 0.30-0.73], P<0.001). ADT improved the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of RP based on a case-controlled study; added ADT to RT failed to challenge the position of RP but could improve the outcome of RT. In conclusions,RP/(RT plus adjuvant ADT) could both be used for the first-line therapy of high-risk PCa. When encountering an individual patient, urologists should consider various factors like tumors themselves, preferences of individuals, and so on.

Indexed as

Combined Modality TherapyHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeWatchful Waiting

Identifiers

PMID25578739
PMCPMC5378991
OpenAlexW2080934925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.