Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25578678›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2015

Prognosis of neutropenic patients admitted to the intensive care unit.

D Mokart, M Darmon, M Resche-Rigon, V Lemiale, F Pène, J Mayaux, A Rabbat, A Kouatchet, F Vincent, M Nyunga and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03449953 (Critical Care Outcomes of Patients With Hematologic Malignancy and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03449953 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Critical Care Outcomes of Patients With Hematologic Malignancy and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

TypeobservationalSponsorMount Sinai Hospital, CanadaRan2018 to 2026Enrolled415ConditionsHematologic Malignancy, Stem Cell Transplant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A decision analysis of cancer patients and the consumption of ready-to-eat salad.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. [Cancer patients in the intensive care unit].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Critically ill patients with cancer: A clinical perspective.World journal of clinical oncology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Focus on immunocompromised patients.Intensive care medicine · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

D MokartPolyvalent Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Institut Paoli Calmettes, 232 Boulevard Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille Cedex 09, France, mokartd@ipc.unicancer.fr.
M Darmon
M Resche-Rigon
V Lemiale
F Pène
J Mayaux
A Rabbat
A Kouatchet
F Vincent
M Nyunga
F Bruneel
C Lebert
P Perez
A Renault
R Hamidfar
M Jourdain
A-P Meert
D Benoit
S Chevret
E Azoulay

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe prognosis of critically ill cancer patients has improved recently. Controversies remain as regard to the specific prognosis impact of neutropenia in critically ill cancer patients. The primary objective of this study was to assess hospital outcome of critically ill neutropenic cancer patients admitted into the ICU. The secondary objective was to assess risk factors for unfavorable outcome in this population of patients and specific impact of neutropenia.

methodsWe performed a post hoc analysis of a prospectively collected database. The study was carried out in 17 university or university-affiliated centers in France and Belgium. Neutropenia was defined as a neutrophil count lower than 500/mm(3).

resultsAmong the 1,011 patients admitted into the ICU during the study period 289 were neutropenic at the time of admission. Overall, 131 patients died during their hospital stay (hospital mortality 45.3 %). Four variables were associated with a poor outcome, namely allogeneic transplantation (OR 3.83; 95 % CI 1.75-8.35), need for mechanical ventilation (MV) (OR 6.57; 95 % CI 3.51-12.32), microbiological documentation (OR 2.33; CI 1.27-4.26), and need for renal replacement therapy (OR 2.77; 95 % CI 1.34-5.74). Two variables were associated with hospital survival, namely age younger than 70 (OR 0.22; 95 % CI 0.1-0.52) and neutropenic enterocolitis (OR 0.37; 95 % CI 0.15-0.9). A case-control analysis was also performed with patients of the initial database; after adjustment, neutropenia was not associated with hospital mortality (OR 1.27; 95 % CI 0.86-1.89).

conclusionHospital survival was closely associated with younger age and neutropenic enterocolitis. Conversely, need for conventional MV, for renal replacement therapy, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were associated with poor outcome.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBelgiumCritical IllnessFemaleFranceHospitalizationHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNeutropeniaPrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.