Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25578614›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

The effects of disruptions in ribosomal active sites and in intersubunit contacts on ribosomal degradation in Escherichia coli.

Anton Paier, Margus Leppik, Aksel Soosaar, Tanel Tenson, Ülo Maiväli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2017
    Article
  8. Disassembly of theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anton PaierInstitute of Technology, Univeristy of Tartu, Nooruse 1, Tartu, 50411, Estonia.
Margus LeppikInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Tartu, Riia 23, Tartu, 51010, Estonia.
Aksel SoosaarInstitute of Technology, Univeristy of Tartu, Nooruse 1, Tartu, 50411, Estonia.
Tanel TensonInstitute of Technology, Univeristy of Tartu, Nooruse 1, Tartu, 50411, Estonia.
Ülo MaiväliInstitute of Technology, Univeristy of Tartu, Nooruse 1, Tartu, 50411, Estonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although ribosomes are very stable under most conditions, ribosomal degradation does occur in diverse groups of organisms in response to specific stresses or environmental conditions. While non-functional ribosome decay (NRD) in yeast is well characterized, very little is known of the mechanisms that initiate ribosomal degradation in bacteria. Here we test ribosome degradation in growing Escherichia coli expressing mutant ribosomes. We found that mutations in the 16S rRNA decoding centre (G530U and A1492C) and 23S rRNA active site (A2451G) do not lead to ribosomal degradation. In contrast, 23S rRNA mutation U2585A causes degradation of both the large and small ribosomal subunits in E. coli. We further tested mutations in 23S rRNA, which disrupt ribosomal intersubunit bridges B2a and B3. Deletion of helix 69 of 23S rRNA and the point mutation A1912G in the same helix did not destabilize ribosomes, while expression of mutations A1919G in H69 and A1960G in H71 led to degradation of both mutant and wild-type ribosomes. Our results suggest an actively induced mechanism requiring de novo protein synthesis for ribosomal degradation in E. coli, which degrades both structurally inactive and active ribosomes.

Indexed as

Catalytic DomainRNA StabilityEscherichia coliMutationProtein StabilityRibosomesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 23SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 23S

Identifiers

PMID25578614
PMCPMC4289901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.