Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25578557›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2015

The increasing value of plant-made proteins.

Markus Sack, Anna Hofbauer, Rainer Fischer, Eva Stoger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
23.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Markus SackInstitute for Molecular Biotechnology, RWTH Aachen, Germany.
Anna HofbauerDepartment of Applied Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Rainer FischerInstitute for Molecular Biotechnology, RWTH Aachen, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (IME), Aachen, Germany.
Eva StogerDepartment of Applied Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: eva.stoger@boku.ac.at.
BOKU University · ATFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology · DERWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 1103Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The production of high-value proteins in plants is maturing, as shown by the recent approval of innovative products and the latest studies that showcase plant-based production systems using technologies and approaches that are well established in other fields. These include host cell engineering, medium optimization, scalable unit operations for downstream processing (DSP), bioprocess optimization and detailed cost analysis. Product-specific benefits of plant-based systems have also been exploited, including bioencapsulation and the mucosal delivery of minimally processed topical and oral products with a lower entry barrier than pharmaceuticals for injection. Success stories spearheaded by the FDA approval of Elelyso developed by Protalix have revitalized the field and further interest has been fueled by the production of experimental Ebola treatments in plants.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMucous MembranePharmaceutical PreparationsPlant ProteinsPlantsProtein EngineeringPharmaceutical PreparationsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25578557
PMCPMC6485345
OpenAlexW1990382626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.