ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2015
The risk of birth defects after assisted reproduction.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends in the incidence of major birth defects after assisted reproductive technologies in Lombardy Region, Northern Italy.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Article
- Effects of the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic on natural and ART-mediated birth rates in Lombardy Region, Northern Italy.Reproductive biomedicine online · 2021Article
- Trend of medically induced monozygotic twin deliveries according to age, parity, and type of assisted reproductive technique during the period 2007-2017 in Lombardy Region, Northern Italy: a population-based study.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
- Birth defects surveillance after assisted reproductive technology in Beijing: a whole of population-based cohort study.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects in a Chinese birth cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2021Article
- Article
- Observational
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Birth Defects: Effects of Subfertility and Multiple Births.Birth defects research · 2017Article
- An Update on Oxidative Damage to Spermatozoa and Oocytes.BioMed research international · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAim of this study was to investigate the association between congenital malformations and type of conception (spontaneous or medically assisted).
methodsThis is a population based study using data from the regional data base of Lombardy, a Northern Italian Region with a population of about 10 million inhabitants. Included in the study were 277,043 neonates born in Lombardy during the study period 2010-2012. Adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios (OR), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), of congenital abnormalities were calculated using unconditional multiple logistic regression.
resultsA total of 7057 births (2.5%) were reported after non spontaneous conception. Overall, the frequency of birth defects was 4.4% among births after spontaneous conception and 6.7% among births after non spontaneous ones (OR = 1.67, 95%CI = 1.5-1.9). The association disappeared after taking into account the confounding effect of maternal age and factors associated with non spontaneous conception. The crude OR of abnormalities was higher than unity for any defect (OR = 1.67, 95%CI = 1.5-1.9), multiple defects (OR = 1.76, 95%CI = 1.3-2.3), cardiovascular (OR = 2.05, 95%CI = 1.8-2.4), musculoskeletal (OR = 2.05, 95%CI = 1.7-2.5) and metabolic system abnormalities (OR = 1.97, 95%CI = 1.1-3.5). Almost all these associations, however, disappeared after taking into account potential confounding with the exception of musculoskeletal defects (adjusted OR = 1.31, 95%CI = 1.1-1.6). In this case also, if adjustment for multiple comparison is taking into account, results did not reach statistical significance.
conclusionsThe results of this analysis confirm the recently emerging view that the increased frequency of birth defects observed after ART/medically induced ovulation only is largely due to confounders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.