ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2016
Use of Pooled State Administrative Data for Mental Health Services Research.
Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The COVID-19 Pandemic and Dementia: a Multijurisdictional Meta-Analysis of the Impact of the First Two Pandemic Waves on Acute Health-care Utilization and Mortality in Canada.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2025Article
- Impact of Illness Severity Tools on Adolescent Psychiatric Managed Care in California.Administration and policy in mental health · 2024Article
- Variation in Psychotropic Medication Prescription for Adults With Schizophrenia in the United States.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Article
- The implementation potential of a method to monitor empirically-supported children's mental health treatment through claims data.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Train-to-Sustain: Predictors of Sustainment in a Large-Scale Implementation of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy.Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health · 2021Article
- Applying an Electronic Health Records Data Quality Framework Across Service Sectors: A Case Study of Juvenile Justice System Data.EGEMS (Washington, DC) · 2019Article
- Advancing the state-level tracking of evidence-based practices: a case study.International journal of mental health systems · 2019Article
- Patterns and predictors of compliance with utilization management guidelines supporting a state policy to improve the quality of youth mental health services.Children and youth services review · 2019Article
- Using Survival Analysis to Understand Patterns of Sustainment within a System-Driven Implementation of Multiple Evidence-Based Practices for Children's Mental Health Services.Frontiers in public health · 2018Article
- Measuring Sustainment of Multiple Practices Fiscally Mandated in Children's Mental Health Services.Administration and policy in mental health · 2016Article
- The 4KEEPS study: identifying predictors of sustainment of multiple practices fiscally mandated in children's mental health services.Implementation science : IS · 2016Observational
- Prospective predictors of sustainment of multiple EBPs in a system-driven implementation context: Examining sustained delivery based on administrative claims.Implementation research and practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
State systems are a rich, albeit challenging, laboratory for policy-relevant services research studies. State mental health authorities routinely devote resources to collect data for state planning and reporting purposes. However, these data are rarely used in cross-state comparisons to inform state or federal policy development. In 2008, in response to key recommendations from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Advisory Council's "The Road Ahead: Research Partnership to Transform Services," (http://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/advisory-boards-and-groups/namhc/reports/road-ahead.pdf), NIMH issued a request for applications (RFA) to support studies on the impact of state policy changes on access, cost, quality and outcomes of care for individuals with mental disorders. The purpose of the RFA was to bridge the divide between research and policy by encouraging research that used state administrative data across states, and to address significant state-defined health policy initiatives. Five projects involving eight states were selected through peer review for funding. Projects began in 2009 and were funded for 3 years. This report provides a brief description of the five projects, followed by an analysis of the impact, challenges, and lessons learned from these policy-partnered studies. We conclude by offering suggestions on ways to use state administrative data for informing state health policies, which is especially timely given national and state changes in the structure and financing of healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.