Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25578254›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology2015

The Physician Payments Sunshine Act: data evaluation regarding payments to ophthalmologists.

Jonathan S Chang

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Quantifying Conflict of Interest in the Choice of Anti-VEGF Agents.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021
    Article
  3. Conflicts of interest among dermatology textbook authors.International journal of women's dermatology · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Where the Sun Shines: Industry's Payments to Transplant Surgeons.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jonathan S ChangEdward Harkness Institute of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: jsc2101@columbia.edu.

Funding

Instrumentation, Fabrication, and Design CoreP30EY019007 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Xin Zhang · 2010 to 2026
$12.9M
NEI NIH HHS 5P30EY019007NEI NIH HHS P30 EY019007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo review data for ophthalmologists published online from the Physician Payments Sunshine Act.

designRetrospective data review using data acquired from a publicly available electronic database.

methodsA database was downloaded from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services website under Identified General Payments to Physicians and a primary specialty of ophthalmology. Basic statistical analysis was performed including mean, median, and range of payments for both single payments and per provider.

main outcome measuresData summary by category of payment and geographic region and comparison with other surgical subspecialties.

resultsFrom August 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013, a total of 55 996 individual payments were reported to 9855 ophthalmologists for a total of $10 926 447. The mean amount received in a single payment was $195.13 (range, $0.04-$193 073). The mean amount received per physician identifier (ID) was $1108 (range, $1-$397 849), and the median amount was $112.01. Consulting fees made up the largest percentage of fees. There was not a large difference in payments received by region. The mean payments for the subspecialties of dermatology, neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, and urology ranged from $954 to $6980, and median payments in each field by physician ID ranged from $88 to $173.

conclusionsA large amount of data were released by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for the Physician Payment Sunshine Act. In ophthalmology, mean and median payments per physician did not vary greatly from other surgical subspecialties. Most single payments were less than $100, and most physicians received less than $500 in total payments. Payments for consulting made up the largest category of spending. How this affects patient perception, patient care, and medical costs warrants further study.

Indexed as

Gift GivingTruth DisclosureCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.Databases, FactualDrug IndustryHumansOphthalmologyPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID25578254
PMCPMC4372488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.