ArticleOphthalmology2015
The Physician Payments Sunshine Act: data evaluation regarding payments to ophthalmologists.
Article in Ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conflicts of Interest in "Throwaway" Dermatology Publications: Analysis of the Open Payments Database.JMIR dermatology · 2021Article
- Quantifying Conflict of Interest in the Choice of Anti-VEGF Agents.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- Conflicts of interest among dermatology textbook authors.International journal of women's dermatology · 2019Review
- Ophthalmology Patient Perceptions of Open Payments Information.JAMA ophthalmology · 2018Article
- Mining Open Payments Data: Analysis of Industry Payments to Thoracic Surgeons From 2014-2016.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Article
- A cross-sectional study of all clinicians' conflict of interest disclosures to NHS hospital employers in England 2015-2016.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Association of Gender With Financial Relationships Between Industry and Academic Otolaryngologists.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2017Article
- Industry Payments to Urologists in 2014: an Analysis of the Open Payments Program.Urology practice · 2017Article
- The Dawn of Transparency: Insights from the Physician Payment Sunshine Act in Plastic Surgery.Annals of plastic surgery · 2017Article
- Here Comes the Sunshine: Industry's Payments to Cardiothoracic Surgeons.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2017Article
- Urology Payments from Industry in the Sunshine Act.Urology practice · 2016Article
- Association between payments from manufacturers of pharmaceuticals to physicians and regional prescribing: cross sectional ecological study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016Article
- Where the Sun Shines: Industry's Payments to Transplant Surgeons.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2016Article
- Disclosure of Industry Payments to Physicians: An Epidemiologic Analysis of Early Data From the Open Payments Program.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2016Review
- Orthopaedic Surgeons Receive the Most Industry Payments to Physicians but Large Disparities are Seen in Sunshine Act Data.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo review data for ophthalmologists published online from the Physician Payments Sunshine Act.
designRetrospective data review using data acquired from a publicly available electronic database.
methodsA database was downloaded from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services website under Identified General Payments to Physicians and a primary specialty of ophthalmology. Basic statistical analysis was performed including mean, median, and range of payments for both single payments and per provider.
main outcome measuresData summary by category of payment and geographic region and comparison with other surgical subspecialties.
resultsFrom August 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013, a total of 55 996 individual payments were reported to 9855 ophthalmologists for a total of $10 926 447. The mean amount received in a single payment was $195.13 (range, $0.04-$193 073). The mean amount received per physician identifier (ID) was $1108 (range, $1-$397 849), and the median amount was $112.01. Consulting fees made up the largest percentage of fees. There was not a large difference in payments received by region. The mean payments for the subspecialties of dermatology, neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, and urology ranged from $954 to $6980, and median payments in each field by physician ID ranged from $88 to $173.
conclusionsA large amount of data were released by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for the Physician Payment Sunshine Act. In ophthalmology, mean and median payments per physician did not vary greatly from other surgical subspecialties. Most single payments were less than $100, and most physicians received less than $500 in total payments. Payments for consulting made up the largest category of spending. How this affects patient perception, patient care, and medical costs warrants further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.