Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25578150›Full record

ReviewPituitary2015

Screening for Cushing's syndrome: is it worthwhile?

Ilan Shimon

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pituitary, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Toward a Diagnostic Score in Cushing's Syndrome.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019
    Review
  15. Secondary Arterial Hypertension: From Routine Clinical Practice to Evidence in Patients with Adrenal Tumor.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ilan ShimonRabin Medical Center, Institute of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Beilinson Hospital, 49100, Petach Tikva, Israel, ilanshi@clalit.org.il.
Rabin Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCushing's syndrome (CS) is a rare disease characterized by a collection of signs and symptoms, also common in the general population without elevated cortisol secretion. During the last years more patients with CS are identified earlier and with milder disease. Many of these patients are diagnosed during screening efforts performed for certain or isolated complaints like weight gain, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, osteoporosis, elevated white blood cell counts and more.

methodsIn this review article the most popular screening test performed in the studies cited was the 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test.

conclusionsCushing is not frequent enough to support the use of routine screening in patients with morbid obesity and type 2 DM. Also only 1% of hypertensive patients have secondary hypertension due to CS. However, screening should be considered in young patients with resistant DM and/or hypertension. Among patients with osteoporosis and vertebral fractures up to 5% were diagnosed with subclinical hypercortisolism; most of these had adrenal adenoma. Screening for CS is important in subjects with adrenal incidentaloma, and many studies show a high prevalence (~10%) of Cushing or subclinical CS in these patients.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex Function TestsACTH-Secreting Pituitary AdenomaAdenomaComorbidityDexamethasoneHumansMass ScreeningPatient SelectionPituitary ACTH HypersecretionPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsDexamethasone

Identifiers

PMID25578150
OpenAlexW2027887214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.