Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25577522›Full record

Trial reportEuropean radiology2015

Use of diagnostic dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI for targeting of soft tissue tumour biopsies at 3T: preliminary results.

Iris-Melanie Noebauer-Huhmann, Gabriele Amann, Martin Krssak, Joannis Panotopoulos, Pavol Szomolanyi, Michael Weber, Christian Czerny, Martin Breitenseher, Guenther Grabner, Wolfgang Bogner and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Applying dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI tracer kinetic models to differentiate benign and malignant soft tissue tumors.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Iris-Melanie Noebauer-HuhmannDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Neuroradiology and Musculoskeletal Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, iris.noebauer@meduniwien.ac.at.
Gabriele Amann
Martin Krssak
Joannis Panotopoulos
Pavol Szomolanyi
Michael Weber
Christian Czerny
Martin Breitenseher
Guenther Grabner
Wolfgang Bogner
Stefan Nemec
Martin Dominkus
Philipp Funovics
Reinhard Windhager
Siegfried Trattnig
Medical University of Vienna · ATLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology · ATOrthopaedic Hospital Speising · ATSlovak Academy of Sciences · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo test the feasibility and accuracy of MR-guided soft tissue tumour biopsy at 3T, using the dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) information from staging MRI for intralesional targeting.

methodsAfter obtaining written informed consent for this institutional review board-approved study, 53 patients with suspected soft tissue tumours prospectively underwent preoperative staging MRI at 3T, including DCE, and subsequent MR-guided core needle biopsy. In 44/53 cases, DCE was heterogeneous and was used for intralesional biopsy targeting. Surgical, whole-specimen histology was used as the gold standard in 43/44 patients and revealed 42 soft tissue tumours (24 men; 18 women; mean age, 52 years; range, 19 - 84).

resultsFinal surgical histology revealed eight benign lesions, six tumours of intermediate dignity, and 28 malignancies. All malignancies had shown heterogeneous DCE. The diagnostic yield of the biopsies was 100% (42/42). Histological accuracy rates of biopsy were 100% in predicting the dignity (42/42; 95% CI [0.916 - 1.000]), 95.2% for the tissue-specific entity (40/42; 95% CI [0.847 - 0.987]), and 90.5% for the tumour grade (38/42; 95% CI [0.779 - 0.962]).

conclusionsOur preliminary study indicates that biopsy of soft tissue tumours can be performed accurately and safely with DCE targeted MR-guidance at 3T, using a combined staging/biopsy MRI protocol. KEY POINTS: • MR-guided soft tissue tumour biopsy using DCE for intralesional targeting is feasible. • Targeting by staging-MRI allows reliable planning of the biopsy approach. • The method seems accurate and safe as a combined staging/biopsy procedure in outpatients. • DCE-targeted biopsy seems useful in challenging large and heterogeneous tumours.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsy, NeedleContrast MediaFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance Imaging, InterventionalMaleMeglumineMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOrganometallic CompoundsContrast Mediagadobenic acidgadobutrolMeglumineOrganometallic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID25577522
OpenAlexW2138338209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.