ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2015
Discrimination of normal and esophageal cancer plasma proteomes by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A metabolomic and proteomic study to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of immunotherapy resistance in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Biomedical reports · 2023Article
- Anaphylatoxin C3a: A potential biomarker for esophageal cancer diagnosis.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMost patients presenting with symptoms of esophageal cancer (EC) have advanced disease. Even with resection, the cure rate is extremely low due to local recurrence and metastatic disease. Early detection and effective therapeutic intervention are essential to improve survival.
aimsThis study tested the hypothesis that the presence of EC modulates concentrations of specific plasma proteins and peptides, potentially allowing discrimination between EC and controls based on mass spectrometric analysis of the respective plasma proteomes.
methodsBlood samples from 79 esophageal cancer patients and 40 age-matched normal subjects were processed to plasma, and protein/peptide sub-fractions were isolated using HIC8 or WAX-derivatized superparamagnetic beads. Triplicate matrix-assisted laser desorption time-of-flight mass spectra were acquired for specific plasma fractions from each subject.
resultsHIC8 and WAX-derivatized plasma eluates yielded 79 and 77 candidate features, respectively, and a Random Forest algorithm identified a subset of features whose peak intensities allowed discrimination between cancer patients and controls. Areas under the curve in receiver operating characteristic curves for HIC8 spectra were 0.88 and 0.83 for WAX spectra. The combined feature set discriminated EC from control plasma with 79 % sensitivity and 79 % specificity, with positive and negative test likelihood ratios of >14 and 0.17, respectively.
conclusionsThese data lay the foundation for the development of a clinically useful test for esophageal cancer based on statistical analysis of proteomic spectra of patient plasma samples. This approach will be validated by analysis of larger patient cohorts, development of cancer-specific classifiers, and assessment of racial origin imbalances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25577268What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.