Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25577192›Full record

ArticleJournal of health services research & policy2015

Who should decide how much and what information is important in person-centred health care?

Mette Kjer Kaltoft, Jesper Bo Nielsen, Glenn Salkeld, Jack Dowie

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health services research & policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mette Kjer KaltoftPhD student, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark mkaltoft@health.sdu.dk.
Jesper Bo NielsenProfessor, Head of Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Glenn SalkeldProfessor, Head of School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Jack DowieEmeritus Professor of Health Impact Analysis, Public Health and Policy Faculty, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most guidelines for clinical practice, and especially those for the construction of decision support tools, assume that the individual person (the patient) needs to be in possession of information of particular sorts and amount in order to qualify as having made an 'informed decision'. This often implicitly segues into the patient having made a 'good decision'. In person-centred health care, whether, in what form, and with what weight, 'information' is included as a criterion of decision quality is a matter for the person involved, to decide in the light of their own values, preferences, and time and resource constraints.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPatient ParticipationHumansPatient-Centered CareTrustdecision qualitydecision supportinformed decisionmulti-criteria decision analysis

Identifiers

PMID25577192
PMCPMC4469540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.