Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25577189›Full record

Trial reportBehaviour research and therapy2015

Randomized controlled pilot trial of a novel dissonance-based group treatment for eating disorders.

Eric Stice, Paul Rohde, Meghan Butryn, Katharine S Menke, C Nathan Marti

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Behaviour research and therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A framework for conceptualising early intervention for eating disorders.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Thin-ideal internalization: How much is too much?Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eric SticeOregon Research Institute, USA. Electronic address: estice@ori.org.
Paul RohdeOregon Research Institute, USA.
Meghan ButrynDrexel University, USA.
Katharine S MenkeUniversity of Texas at Austin, USA.
C Nathan MartiUniversity of Texas at Austin, USA.
Oregon Research Institute · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USDrexel University · US

Funding

Targeted Obesity Prevention Program for Adolescent FemalesR01DK072932 · NIDDK · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STICE, ERIC M · 2007 to 2011
$2.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK072932NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK072932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The authors conducted a pilot trial of a new dissonance-based group eating disorder treatment designed to be a cost-effective front-line transdiagnostic treatment that could be more widely disseminated than extant individual or family treatments that are more expensive and difficult to deliver. Young women with a DSM-5 eating disorder (N = 72) were randomized to an 8-week dissonance-based Counter Attitudinal Therapy group treatment or a usual care control condition, completing diagnostic interviews and questionnaires at pre, post, and 2-month follow-up. Intent-to-treat analyses revealed that intervention participants showed greater reductions in outcomes than usual care controls in a multivariate multilevel model (χ(2)[6] = 34.1, p < .001), producing large effects for thin-ideal internalization (d = .79), body dissatisfaction (d = 1.14), and blinded interview-assessed eating disorder symptoms (d = .95), and medium effects for dissonance regarding perpetuating the thin ideal (d = .65) and negative affect (d = .55). Midway through this pilot we refined engagement procedures, which was associated with increased effect sizes (e.g., the d for eating disorder symptoms increased from .51 to 2.30). This new group treatment produced large reductions in eating disorder symptoms, which is encouraging because it requires about 1/20th the therapist time necessary for extant individual and family treatments, and has the potential to provide a cost-effective and efficacious approach to reaching the majority of individuals with eating disorders who do not presently received treatment.

Indexed as

Cognitive DissonanceAdolescentAdultAttitudeBody ImageCognitive Behavioral TherapyFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHumansPilot ProjectsPsychotherapy, GroupSelf ConceptTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultDissonanceEating disorderEfficacy trialGroupTreatment

Identifiers

PMID25577189
PMCPMC4343210
OpenAlexW1968289353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.