Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25577038›Full record

ArticleNuclear medicine and biology2015

Radiolabeled antibodies in prostate cancer: a case study showing the effect of host immunity on antibody bio-distribution.

Oskar Vilhelmsson-Timmermand, Elmer Santos, Daniel L J Thorek, Susan Evans-Axelsson, Anders Bjartell, Hans Lilja, Steven M Larson, Sven-Erik Strand, Thuy A Tran, David Ulmert

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear medicine and biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Humanization, Radiolabeling and Biodistribution Studies of an IgGPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Molecular imaging and biology · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Harnessing Androgen Receptor Pathway Activation for Targeted Alpha Particle Radioimmunotherapy of Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Oncotarget · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Oskar Vilhelmsson-TimmermandDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Elmer SantosDepartment of Radiology (Nuclear Medicine Service), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Daniel L J ThorekDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Division of Nuclear Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Susan Evans-AxelssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Urological Cancers, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Anders BjartellDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Urological Cancers, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Hans LiljaDepartment of Surgery (Urology), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Medicine (GU Oncology), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Steven M LarsonDepartment of Radiology (Nuclear Medicine Service), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Sven-Erik StrandDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Thuy A TranDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Lund University Bioimaging Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
David UlmertDepartment of Surgery (Urology), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Urological Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden. Electronic address: ulmerth@mskcc.org.
Lund University · SEMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SPORE In Prostate CancerP50CA092629 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Yu Chen, MICHAEL J MORRIS · 2001 to 2026
$63.0M
Tumor Evolution and Changes in MetabolismP50CA086438 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI RIVIERI, ISABELLE · 2000 to 2015
$29.9M
SHARED INSTRUMENT: FOCUS MICROPET: CANCERS10RR020892 · NCRR · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI LARSON, STEVEN MARK · 2005 to 2005
$499k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA086438NCI NIH HHS P50 CA092629NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR020892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHuman tumors xenografted in immunodeficient mice are crucial models in nuclear medicine to evaluate the effectiveness of candidate diagnostic and therapeutic compounds. However, little attention has been focused on the biological profile of the host model and its potential effects on the bio-distribution and tumor targeting of the tracer compound under study. We specifically investigated the dissimilarity in bio-distribution of (111)In-DTPA-5A10, which targets free prostate specific antigen (fPSA), in two animal models.

methodsIn vivo bio-distribution studies of (111)In-DTPA-5A10 were performed in immunodeficient BALB/c-nu or NMRI-nu mice with subcutaneous (s.c.) LNCaP tumors. Targeting-specificity of the tracer was assessed by quantifying the uptake in (a) mice with s.c. xenografts of PSA-negative DU145 cells as well as (b) BALB/c-nu or NMRI-nu mice co-injected with an excess of non-labeled 5A10. Finally, the effect of neonatal Fc-receptor (FcRn) inhibition on the bio-distribution of the conjugate was studied by saturating FcRn-binding capacity with nonspecific IgG1.

resultsThe inherent biological attributes of the mouse model substantially influenced the bio-distribution and pharmacokinetics of (111)In-DTPA-5A10. With LNCaP xenografts in BALB/c-nu mice (with intact B and NK cells but with deficient T cells) versus NMRI-nu mice (with intact B cells, increased NK cells and absent T cells), we observed a significantly higher hepatic accumulation (26 ± 3.9 versus 3.5 ± 0.4%IA/g respectively), and concomitantly lower tumor uptake (25 ± 11 versus 52 ± 10%IA/g respectively) in BALB/c-nu mice. Inhibiting FcRn by administration of nonspecific IgG1 just prior to (111)In-DTPA-5A10 did not change tumor accumulation significantly.

conclusionsWe demonstrated that the choice of immunodeficient mouse model importantly influence the bio-distribution of (111)In-DTPA-5A10. This study further highlighted important considerations in the evaluation of preclinical tracers, with respect to gaining information on their performance in the translational setting. Investigators utilizing xenograft models need to assess not only radiolabeling strategies, but also the host immunological status.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorCell Transformation, NeoplasticHumansImmunocompetenceImmunoconjugatesImmunoglobulin GIndium RadioisotopesIsotope LabelingMaleMicePentetic AcidProstatic NeoplasmsTissue DistributionImmunoconjugatesImmunoglobulin GIndium RadioisotopesPentetic AcidAntibodiesBiodistributionfPSA-targetingHost-immunityPre-clinical studies

Identifiers

PMID25577038
PMCPMC4472383
OpenAlexW1988065916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.