ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2015
Nonlinear analysis of tRNAs nucleotide sequences by random walks: randomness and order in the primitive informational polymers.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to test the hypothesis that the nucleotide sequences of the primitive informational polymers might not be chosen randomly and in the attempt to compare among taxa, we propose a comparison of computer-generated random sequences with tRNAs nucleotide sequences present in the bacterial and archaeal genomes, being tRNAs molecules possible "fossils" of the time (billions years ago) in which life arose. Our approach is based on the analysis of sequences of tRNAs described as random walks and the distances from the origin evaluated by the use of nonlinear indexes (largest Lyapunov exponent, entropy, BDS statistic). Six different tRNAs of Bacteria and Archaea (ten Archaea and ten Bacteria, thermophilic and mesophilic ones; n = 120), and computer-generated random sequences (n = 50) were studied. Our data show that tRNAs present indices statistical lower than the ones of computer-generated random data (tRNAs own a more ordered sequence than random ones: Lyapunov, p < 0.01; entropy, p < 0.05; BDS, p < 0.01). The observed deviation from pure randomness should be arisen from some constraints like the secondary structure of this biologic macromolecule and/or from a "frozen" stochastic transition, or even from the possible peculiar origin of tRNA by replication of older proto-RNA. Comparing between taxa, in the species studied, Bacteria present BDS and Base ratio (G+C)/(A+T) indexes statistically lower than in Archaea, together which a 20% of entropy increase. The analysis of a greater number of tRNAs and species will permit to explain if this finding, showing a higher randomness in the bacterial tRNAs sequences, is linked to the different base ratio, to the different environments in which the microorganisms live or to an evolutionary effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.