Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25576651›Full record

ReviewAgeing research reviews2015

Lifelong brain health is a lifelong challenge: from evolutionary principles to empirical evidence.

Mark P Mattson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ageing research reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Targeting macro- and micro-nutrient regulation of HNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Saturated fat in an evolutionary context.Lipids in health and disease · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark P MattsonLaboratory of Neurosciences, National Institute on Aging Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD 21224, United States. Electronic address: mark.mattson@nih.gov.
National Institute on Aging · US

Funding

Synaptic Plasticity In Aging And Neurodegenerative DisordersZIAAG000317 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI MATTSON, MARK · 2009 to 2018
$8.5M
Neuroprotective And Neurorestorative Signaling Mechanisms in Alzheimer's DiseaseZIAAG000314 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI MATTSON, MARK · 2009 to 2018
$6.7M
Cellular And Molecular Pathogenesis Of Alzheimer's DiseaseZIAAG000312 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI MATTSON, MARK · 2009 to 2018
$6.4M
Hormesis/Adaptive Stress Responses and AgingZIAAG000331 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI MATTSON, MARK · 2009 to 2018
$5.0M
Dietary Modification Of Brain Aging And Neurodegenerative DisordersZIAAG000315 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI MATTSON, MARK · 2009 to 2018
$5.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AG000312Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AG000314Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AG000315Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AG000317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the human brain is exceptional in size and information processing capabilities, it is similar to other mammals with regard to the factors that promote its optimal performance. Three such factors are the challenges of physical exercise, food deprivation/fasting, and social/intellectual engagement. Because it evolved, in part, for success in seeking and acquiring food, the brain functions best when the individual is hungry and physically active, as typified by the hungry lion stalking and chasing its prey. Indeed, studies of animal models and human subjects demonstrate robust beneficial effects of regular exercise and intermittent energy restriction/fasting on cognitive function and mood, particularly in the contexts of aging and associated neurodegenerative disorders. Unfortunately, the agricultural revolution and the invention of effort-sparing technologies have resulted in a dramatic reduction or elimination of vigorous exercise and fasting, leaving only intellectual challenges to bolster brain function. In addition to disengaging beneficial adaptive responses in the brain, sedentary overindulgent lifestyles promote obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease, all of which may increase the risk of cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. It is therefore important to embrace the reality of the requirements for exercise, intermittent fasting and critical thinking for optimal brain health throughout life, and to recognize the dire consequences for our aging population of failing to implement such brain-healthy lifestyles.

Indexed as

AgingExerciseFastingInterpersonal RelationsAttitude to HealthBiological EvolutionBrainCognitionHumansLife StyleNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeuronal PlasticityAlzheimer's diseaseExerciseIntermittent fastingKetone bodiesParkinson's diseaseSynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID25576651
PMCPMC4346441
OpenAlexW2075943282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.