ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2015
Decision-making preferences of Jordanian women diagnosed with breast cancer.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mediating Effects of Health Literacy, Self-Efficacy, and Social Support on the Relationship Between Disease Knowledge and Patient Participation Behavior Among Chronic Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation and Behavior (COM-B) Model.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Translation and cultural adaption of the control preference scale across various care settings in a Danish hospital.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
- Facilitators and barriers to decision-making for hospital treatment among patients diagnosed with breast cancer in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A qualitative urban-based study.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Exploring patient treatment decision making for osteoarthritis in the UAE: a cross-sectional adaptive choice-based conjoint study.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Decision-Making Preferences among Advanced Cancer Patients in a Palliative Setting in Jordan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Disclosure of Cancer Diagnosis: an Individualized and Non-paternalistic Approach Is Preferred.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018Article
- Participation in treatment decision-making among Chinese-Australian women with breast cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017Article
- Preferences for Shared Decision Making in Older Adult Patients With Orthopedic Hand Conditions.The Journal of hand surgery · 2016Article
- Factors Affecting Jordanian Women's Surgical Treatment Decisions for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursingArticle
- Unmet Supportive Care Needs of Jordanian Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursingArticle
- Promoting emancipated decision-making for surgical treatment of early stage breast cancer among Jordanian women.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of the study was to determine Jordanian women's preferences regarding participation in decision-making related to their breast cancer treatment.
methodsA cross-sectional survey design was used in this study. A convenience sample of 156 Jordanian women, who had a confirmed, first-time diagnosis of breast cancer within 18 months prior to the study and had undergone treatment at three hospitals in Central and Northern Jordan, was recruited for the study. A modified version of the Control Preferences Scale was used for data collection.
resultsMore than half of the participants (57 %) wanted the physician to make the decision about the appropriate treatment, approximately 33 % wanted to share the decision with the physician, and only 10 % wanted to make their own decisions. Participants aged more than 50 years, those with secondary school education or less, and those who were undergoing treatment at the public or teaching hospital under study were more likely to prefer a passive role in decision-making regarding treatment.
conclusionsAlthough more than half of the participants involved in this study preferred to play a passive role, their preferences in this regard varied. This highlighted the importance of individually assessing patients' preferences regarding participation in the decision-making process and provision of information that is tailored according to each patient's needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25576431What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.