Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25576340›Full record

ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2015

Direct intracardiac injection of umbilical cord-derived stromal cells and umbilical cord blood-derived endothelial cells for the treatment of ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Paula H Suss, Luiz Guilherme A Capriglione, Fabiane Barchiki, Lye Miyague, Danielle Jackowski, Letícia Fracaro, Andressa V Schittini, Alexandra C Senegaglia, Carmen L K Rebelatto, Márcia Olandoski and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Systemic Infusion of Expanded CD133Stem cells international · 2019
    Article
  7. Expanded CD133Stem cells international · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paula H SussCore for Cell Technology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba 80.215-901, Brazil paula.h@pucpr.br paulahansensuss@gmail.com.
Luiz Guilherme A CapriglioneCore for Cell Technology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba 80.215-901, Brazil.
Fabiane BarchikiCore for Cell Technology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba 80.215-901, Brazil.
Lye MiyagueCore for Cell Technology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba 80.215-901, Brazil.
Danielle JackowskiCore for Cell Technology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba 80.215-901, Brazil.
Letícia FracaroCore for Cell Technology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba 80.215-901, Brazil.
Andressa V SchittiniCarlos Chagas Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, FIOCRUZ/PR, Curitiba 81.350-010, Brazil.
Alexandra C SenegagliaCore for Cell Technology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba 80.215-901, Brazil.
Carmen L K RebelattoCore for Cell Technology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba 80.215-901, Brazil.
Márcia OlandoskiCore for Cell Technology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba 80.215-901, Brazil.
Alejandro CorreaCarlos Chagas Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, FIOCRUZ/PR, Curitiba 81.350-010, Brazil.
Paulo R S BrofmanCore for Cell Technology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba 80.215-901, Brazil.
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of new therapeutic strategies is necessary to reduce the worldwide social and economic impact of cardiovascular disease, which produces high rates of morbidity and mortality. A therapeutic option that has emerged in the last decade is cell therapy. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of transplanting human umbilical cord-derived stromal cells (UCSCs), human umbilical cord blood-derived endothelial cells (UCBECs) or a combination of these two cell types for the treatment of ischemic cardiomyopathy (IC) in a Wistar rat model. IC was induced by left coronary artery ligation, and baseline echocardiography was performed seven days later. Animals with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤40% were selected for the study. On the ninth day after IC was induced, the animals were randomized into the following experimental groups: UCSCs, UCBECs, UCSCs plus UCBECs, or vehicle (control). Thirty days after treatment, an echocardiographic analysis was performed, followed by euthanasia. The animals in all of the cell therapy groups, regardless of the cell type transplanted, had less collagen deposition in their heart tissue and demonstrated a significant improvement in myocardial function after IC. Furthermore, there was a trend of increasing numbers of blood vessels in the infarcted area. The median value of LVEF increased by 7.19% to 11.77%, whereas the control group decreased by 0.24%. These results suggest that UCSCs and UCBECs are promising cells for cellular cardiomyoplasty and can be an effective therapy for improving cardiac function following IC.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell SeparationCord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationDisease Models, AnimalEndothelial CellsFlow CytometryFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMyocardial IschemiaRatsRats, WistarTransplantation, Heterologouscell therapyhuman umbilical cord blood-derived endothelial cellsHuman umbilical cord-derived stromal cellsischemic cardiomyopathy

Identifiers

PMID25576340
PMCPMC4935404
OpenAlexW2169470087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.