ArticleAmbio2015
Closing the collaborative gap: Aligning social and ecological connectivity for better management of interconnected wetlands.
Article in Ambio, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Logical interdependencies in infrastructure: What are they, how to identify them, and what do they mean for infrastructure risk analysis?Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025Article
- Systems thinking and modelling to support transformative change: key lessons from inter-disciplinary analysis of socio-ecological systems in applied land systems research.Discover sustainability · 2025Review
- Neighbourhood benthic configuration reveals hidden co-occurrence social diversity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Social-ecological network analysis for sustainability sciences: a systematic review and innovative research agenda for the future.Environmental research letters : ERL [Web site] · 2019Article
- Ecosystem services and ecological degradation of communal wetlands in a South African biodiversity hotspot.Royal Society open science · 2019Article
- Connectivity and complex systems: learning from a multi-disciplinary perspective.Applied network science · 2018Review
- Social-ecological network analysis of scale mismatches in estuary watershed restoration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Article
- Article
- The spatial and temporal components of functional connectivity in fragmented landscapes.Ambio · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding how governance structures align to ecological processes in a landscape is critical for effective management of ecological resources. Ecological resources are not independent from each other, instead they are interconnected, and their well-being is often critically dependent on upholding ecological connectivity, especially in times of change and disturbances. Coordination and collaboration among managing actors, each managing their own piece of the puzzle, is therefore essentially a requirement for effective management. We present a conceptual model that includes ecological resources, managing and coordinating actors, along with an explicit representation on how all these entities are connected to each other. We apply this model to 25 municipalities that manage 408 wetlands in central Sweden. The study shows a good social and ecological alignment, however with a high prevalence for coordination through third parties. We discuss this pattern emergence, its potential implications, and examine which municipalities adopt these coordinating functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.