ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2015
Acute effect of static exercise on the cardiovascular system: assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Increased Aortic Stiffness With Acute Exercise in Heart Failure: Assessment by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.The American journal of cardiology · 2024Article
- Cardiac Performance and Cardiopulmonary Fitness After Infection With SARS-CoV-2.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Variability of MRI Aortic Stiffness Measurements in a Multicenter Clinical Trial Setting: Intraobserver, Interobserver, and Intracenter Variability of Pulse Wave Velocity and Aortic Strain Measurement.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2020Article
- The effect of varying intensities of lower limb eccentric muscle contractions on left ventricular function.European journal of applied physiology · 2020Article
- Acute effect of static exercise in patients with aortic regurgitation assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: role of left ventricular remodelling.European radiology · 2017Article
- Human Aortic Vasoreactivity in Response to Various Stimuli: A Review.Pulse (Basel, Switzerland)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe acute effect of static exercise on the global dynamics of the cardiovascular system is poorly understood. The use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) may be useful for evaluating this effect.
methodsA total of 12 healthy individuals underwent CMR imaging at rest and while performing a maximal sustained static exercise (weight elevation with both legs). We analyzed the effects on left and right ventricular function, ascending aorta dynamics, and venous capacitance using standard cine and phase-contrast sequences.
resultsWe observed excellent reproducibility in the measurements of the images obtained at rest as well as during static exercise. During exercise, we observed reduced left (-35 ± 8 %, p < 0.001) and right (-44 ± 9 %, p < 0.001) ventricle end-diastolic volumes, reduced left (-35 ± 16 %, p < 0.001) and right (-43 ± 8 %, p < 0.001) ventricle end-systolic volumes (both with a significantly greater reduction in the right ventricle), a reduced superior vena cava cross-sectional area (-20 ± 17 %, p = 0.003), and increased left ventricle wall thickness. We estimated that there was an increase in left ventricle contractility. There were no significant changes in the left and right ventricular ejection fractions. During exercise, we noted a tendency toward decreased aortic distensibility and a reduction of ascending aorta systolic expansion.
conclusionsIn healthy individuals, an acute maximal static exercise produced a reduction in the left ventricle, right ventricle, and superior vena cava volumes as well as signs of increased aortic stiffness without increasing left ventricular systolic wall stress. CMR is feasible and useful in evaluating the hemodynamic effects of static exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.