Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25576230›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2015

Development of an online, publicly accessible naive Bayesian decision support tool for mammographic mass lesions based on the American College of Radiology (ACR) BI-RADS lexicon.

Matthias Benndorf, Elmar Kotter, Mathias Langer, Christoph Herda, Yirong Wu, Elizabeth S Burnside

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Involvement of Machine Learning for Breast Cancer Image Classification: A Survey.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2017
    Review
  8. Applying Naive Bayesian Networks to Disease Prediction: a Systematic Review.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthias BenndorfDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany, matthias.benndorf@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Elmar Kotter
Mathias Langer
Christoph Herda
Yirong Wu
Elizabeth S Burnside

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Christian Capitini · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
Research Training for Computation and Informatics in Biology and MedicineT15LM007359 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Mark W. Craven, Colin Noel Dewey · 2002 to 2026
$22.6M
TrainingU54AI117924 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CRAVEN, MARK W. · 2014 to 2018
$11.3M
Secure Sharing of Clinical History & Genetic Data: Empowering Predictive Pers. MeR01LM011028 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PAGE, CHARLES DAVID · 2011 to 2014
$2.2M
Informatics Techniques to Optimize Mammography for Aging PopulationsR01CA165229 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BURNSIDE, ELIZABETH S · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
Integrating Machine Learning and Physician Expertise for Breast Cancer DiagnosisR01LM010921 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BURNSIDE, ELIZABETH S · 2011 to 2014
$1.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000427NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCI NIH HHS P30CA014520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA165229NCI NIH HHS R01CA165229NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI117924NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010921NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011028NLM NIH HHS R01LM011028NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop and validate a decision support tool for mammographic mass lesions based on a standardized descriptor terminology (BI-RADS lexicon) to reduce variability of practice. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe used separate training data (1,276 lesions, 138 malignant) and validation data (1,177 lesions, 175 malignant). We created naïve Bayes (NB) classifiers from the training data with tenfold cross-validation. Our "inclusive model" comprised BI-RADS categories, BI-RADS descriptors, and age as predictive variables; our "descriptor model" comprised BI-RADS descriptors and age. The resulting NB classifiers were applied to the validation data. We evaluated and compared classifier performance with ROC-analysis.

resultsIn the training data, the inclusive model yields an AUC of 0.959; the descriptor model yields an AUC of 0.910 (P < 0.001). The inclusive model is superior to the clinical performance (BI-RADS categories alone, P < 0.001); the descriptor model performs similarly. When applied to the validation data, the inclusive model yields an AUC of 0.935; the descriptor model yields an AUC of 0.876 (P < 0.001). Again, the inclusive model is superior to the clinical performance (P < 0.001); the descriptor model performs similarly.

conclusionWe consider our classifier a step towards a more uniform interpretation of combinations of BI-RADS descriptors. We provide our classifier at www.ebm-radiology.com/nbmm/index.html . KEY POINTS: • We provide a decision support tool for mammographic masses at www.ebm-radiology.com/nbmm/index.html . • Our tool may reduce variability of practice in BI-RADS category assignment. • A formal analysis of BI-RADS descriptors may enhance radiologists' diagnostic performance.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBayes TheoremBreast NeoplasmsDecision Support Systems, ClinicalFemaleHumansInternetMammographyMiddle AgedRadiologyROC CurveTerminology as TopicUnited States

Identifiers

PMID25576230
PMCPMC4420692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.