ArticleTrends in immunology2015
Environmentally-defined enhancer populations regulate diversity of tissue-resident macrophages.
Article in Trends in immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epigenetic Regulation of Monocyte and Macrophage Function.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Macrophages represent a class of cells specialized for phagocytosis that occurs in multiple, phenotypically distinct populations throughout the body. Two studies published in Cell demonstrate that these phenotypic differences reflect drastic differences in the populations of enhancers that regulate transcription, and that this epigenomic diversity is, in fact, highly plastic and sensitive to environmental cues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.