Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25575450›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2015

Role of inter-hemispheric transfer in generating visual evoked potentials in V1-damaged brain hemispheres.

Voyko Kavcic, Regina L Triplett, Anasuya Das, Tim Martin, Krystel R Huxlin

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05085210 (Visual Restoration of Losses Caused by Cortical Damage), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05085210 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Visual Restoration of Losses Caused by Cortical Damage: a New Protocol to Promote Fast Recovery

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterRan2022 to 2026Enrolled24ConditionsVisual Field Defect, Peripheral, Stroke, Visual Impairment, HemianopsiaArmstranscranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), Computer Based Visual Training, Sham stimulation, Virtual Reality Based Visual Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Voyko KavcicInstitute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA.
Regina L TriplettHobart and William Smith Colleges, Geneva, NY, USA; Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Anasuya DasFlaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Tim MartinDept. Psychology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, USA.
Krystel R HuxlinFlaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA; Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA. Electronic address: huxlin@cvs.rochester.edu.

Funding

VISUAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CTR SUPPORTP30EY001319 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MICHELE RUCCI · 1985 to 2026
$17.5M
VISUAL SCIENCET32EY007125 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Krystel R Huxlin, Duje Tadin · 1990 to 2026
$7.1M
Mechanisms of visual learning in cortical blindnessR01EY021209 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HUXLIN, KRYSTEL R · 2011 to 2014
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS EY021209NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001319NEI NIH HHS P30EY001319NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021209NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007125NEI NIH HHS T32EY007125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Partial cortical blindness is a visual deficit caused by unilateral damage to the primary visual cortex, a condition previously considered beyond hopes of rehabilitation. However, recent data demonstrate that patients may recover both simple and global motion discrimination following intensive training in their blind field. The present experiments characterized motion-induced neural activity of cortically blind (CB) subjects prior to the onset of visual rehabilitation. This was done to provide information about visual processing capabilities available to mediate training-induced visual improvements. Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs) were recorded from two experimental groups consisting of 9 CB subjects and 9 age-matched, visually-intact controls. VEPs were collected following lateralized stimulus presentation to each of the 4 visual field quadrants. VEP waveforms were examined for both stimulus-onset (SO) and motion-onset (MO) related components in postero-lateral electrodes. While stimulus presentation to intact regions of the visual field elicited normal SO-P1, SO-N1, SO-P2 and MO-N2 amplitudes and latencies in contralateral brain regions of CB subjects, these components were not observed contralateral to stimulus presentation in blind quadrants of the visual field. In damaged brain hemispheres, SO-VEPs were only recorded following stimulus presentation to intact visual field quadrants, via inter-hemispheric transfer. MO-VEPs were only recorded from damaged left brain hemispheres, possibly reflecting a native left/right asymmetry in inter-hemispheric connections. The present findings suggest that damaged brain hemispheres contain areas capable of responding to visual stimulation. However, in the absence of training or rehabilitation, these areas only generate detectable VEPs in response to stimulation of the intact hemifield of vision.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlindness, CorticalElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotion PerceptionVisual CortexVisual FieldsCallosal connectionsCortical blindnessHemianopiaInter-hemispheric transfer timeVisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID25575450
PMCPMC4326537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.