Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25575311›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2015

Divergence across diet, time and populations rules out parallel evolution in the gut microbiomes of Trinidadian guppies.

Karen E Sullam, Benjamin E R Rubin, Christopher M Dalton, Susan S Kilham, Alexander S Flecker, Jacob A Russell

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karen E SullamDepartment of Biodiversity, Earth and Environmental Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Benjamin E R Rubin1] Department of Zoology, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, USA [2] Committee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Christopher M DaltonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Susan S KilhamDepartment of Biodiversity, Earth and Environmental Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alexander S FleckerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Jacob A Russell1] Department of Biodiversity, Earth and Environmental Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA [2] Department of Biology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Drexel University · USCornell University · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diverse microbial consortia profoundly influence animal biology, necessitating an understanding of microbiome variation in studies of animal adaptation. Yet, little is known about such variability among fish, in spite of their importance in aquatic ecosystems. The Trinidadian guppy, Poecilia reticulata, is an intriguing candidate to test microbiome-related hypotheses on the drivers and consequences of animal adaptation, given the recent parallel origins of a similar ecotype across streams. To assess the relationships between the microbiome and host adaptation, we used 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing to characterize gut bacteria of two guppy ecotypes with known divergence in diet, life history, physiology and morphology collected from low-predation (LP) and high-predation (HP) habitats in four Trinidadian streams. Guts were populated by several recurring, core bacteria that are related to other fish associates and rarely detected in the environment. Although gut communities of lab-reared guppies differed from those in the wild, microbiome divergence between ecotypes from the same stream was evident under identical rearing conditions, suggesting host genetic divergence can affect associations with gut bacteria. In the field, gut communities varied over time, across streams and between ecotypes in a stream-specific manner. This latter finding, along with PICRUSt predictions of metagenome function, argues against strong parallelism of the gut microbiome in association with LP ecotype evolution. Thus, bacteria cannot be invoked in facilitating the heightened reliance of LP guppies on lower-quality diets. We argue that the macroevolutionary microbiome convergence seen across animals with similar diets may be a signature of secondary microbial shifts arising some time after host-driven adaptation.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimal DistributionAnimalsDietEcosystemEcotypeGastrointestinal MicrobiomePoeciliaRNA, Ribosomal, 16STrinidad and TobagoRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID25575311
PMCPMC4478690
OpenAlexW2013103271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.