ArticleThe international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease2015
Community-based care vs. centralised hospitalisation for MDR-TB patients, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Article in The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mapping the effectiveness of the community tuberculosis care programs: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Comorbidities and treatment outcomes in multidrug resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2018Pooled it
- Time to treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2017Pooled it
- Decentralized care for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2017Pooled it
- Preventing the spread of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and protecting contacts of infectious cases.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2017Pooled it
- The effect of early versus late treatment initiation after diagnosis on the outcomes of patients treated for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review.BMC infectious diseases · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Trial
- Article
- Decentralising DR-TB care: the trade-off between quality of care and service coverage in the early phase of implementation.Public health action · 2025Article
- Actor sensemaking and its role in implementation of the decentralized drug-resistant tuberculosis policy in South Africa.Health policy and planning · 2025Article
- Factors associated with mortality among laboratory-diagnosed drug-resistant tuberculosis patients on treatment, KwaZulu-Natal Province, 2017-2019.The Pan African medical journal · 2024Article
- Cost-consequence analysis of ambulatory clinic- and home-based multidrug-resistant tuberculosis management models in Eswatini.PloS one · 2024Article
- A comparative analysis of the profile and treatment outcomes of tuberculosis patients managed at the community and primary health care facilities in Botswana.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2023Article
- Organisation of care for people receiving drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment in South Africa: a mixed methods study.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Community-based directly observed therapy is effective and results in better treatment outcomes for patients with multi-drug resistant tuberculosis in Uganda.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- What clinic closure reveals about care for drug-resistant TB: a qualitative study.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
settingKwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, a predominantly rural province with a high burden of tuberculosis (TB), multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
objectiveTo determine the most effective care model by comparing MDR-TB treatment outcomes at community-based sites with traditional care at a central, specialised hospital.
designA non-randomised observational prospective cohort study comparing community-based and centralised care. Patients at community-based sites were closer to home and had easier access to care, and home-based care was available from treatment initiation.
resultsFour community-based sites treated 736 patients, while 813 were treated at the centralised hospital (total = 1549 patients). Overall, 75% were HIV co-infected (community: 76% vs. hospitalised: 73%, P = 0.45) and 86% received antiretroviral therapy (community: 91% vs. hospitalised: 82%, P = 0.22). On multivariate analysis, MDR-TB patients were more likely to have a successful treatment outcome if they were treated at a community-based site (adjusted OR 1.43, P = 0.01). However, outcomes at the four community-based sites were heterogeneous, with Site 1 demonstrating that home-based care was associated with an increased treatment success of 72% compared with success rates of 52-60% at the other three sites.
conclusionCommunity-based care for MDR-TB patients was more effective than care in a central, specialised hospital. Home-based care further increased treatment success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.