Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25574586›Full record

ArticleRadiation research2015

Effects of high-dose microbeam irradiation on tumor microvascular function and angiogenesis.

Andrew N Fontanella, Mary-Keara Boss, Michael Hadsell, Jian Zhang, Thies Schroeder, Katherine G Berman, Mark W Dewhirst, Sha Chang, Gregory M Palmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrew N Fontanellaa Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Mary-Keara Boss
Michael Hadsell
Jian Zhang
Thies Schroeder
Katherine G Berman
Mark W Dewhirst
Sha Chang
Gregory M Palmer

Funding

Translational Nanosystems for Improved Lung Cancer Treatment with Small MoleculesU54CA151652 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HAROON, ZISHAN A, TEPPER, JOEL E · 2010 to 2014
$12.1M
Comparative Medicine and Translational Research Training ProgramT32OD011130 · OD · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Lauren Virginia Schnabel · 2012 to 2026
$7.8M
Heat And Radiation Effects On Tumor MicrocirulationR01CA040355 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DEWHIRST, MARK WESLEY · 1985 to 2013
$4.5M
Nanotechnology enabled desktop image-guided microbeam radiation therapy systemRC2CA148487 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHANG, SHA X, ZHOU, OTTO Z · 2009 to 2010
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS 1U54CA151652-01NCI NIH HHS 5RC2CA148487-02NCI NIH HHS BC083195NCI NIH HHS CA40355-27, 28NCI NIH HHS R01 CA040355NCI NIH HHS RC2 CA148487NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151652NIH HHS T32 OD011130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is a form of cancer treatment in which a single large dose of radiation is spatially fractionated in-line or grid-like patterns. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that MRT is capable of eliciting high levels of tumor response while sparing normal tissue that is exposed to the same radiation field. Since a large fraction of the MRT-treated tumor is in the dose valley region that is not directly irradiated, tumor response may be driven by radiation bystander effects, which in turn elicit a microvascular response. Differential alterations in hemodynamics between the tumor and normal tissue may explain the therapeutic advantages of MRT. Direct observation of these dynamic responses presents a challenge for conventional ex vivo analysis. Furthermore, knowledge gleaned from in vitro studies of radiation bystander response has not been widely incorporated into in vivo models of tumor radiotherapy, and the biological contribution of the bystander effect within the tumor microenvironment is unknown. In this study, we employed noninvasive, serial observations of the tumor microenvironment to address the question of how tumor vasculature and HIF-1 expression are affected by microbeam radiotherapy. Tumors (approximately 4 mm in diameter) grown in a dorsal window chamber were irradiated in a single fraction using either a single, microplanar beam (300 micron wide swath) or a wide-field setup (whole-window chamber) to a total dose of 50 Gy. The tumors were optically observed daily for seven days postirradiation. Microvascular changes in the tumor and surrounding normal tissue differed greatly between the wide-field and microbeam treatments. We present evidence that these changes may be due to dissimilar spatial and temporal patterns of HIF-1 expression induced through radiation bystander effects.

Indexed as

AnimalsBystander EffectCell Line, TumorDose Fractionation, RadiationDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1MiceMicrovesselsNeoplasms, ExperimentalNeovascularization, PathologicRadiotherapy, ConformalTreatment OutcomeTumor MicroenvironmentHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1

Identifiers

PMID25574586
PMCPMC4356626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.