ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2014
Socially responsible science is more than "good science".
Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scientific Objectivity and the Pursuit of the Public Good.Science and engineering ethics · 2026Article
- Mapping the ethical and sustainable transition in toxicology: a bibliometric analysis and a review of new approach methodologies.Archives of toxicology · 2026Review
- Building Better Medicine: Translational Justice and the Quest for Equity in US Healthcare.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2025Article
- Transforming Ethics Education Through a Faculty Learning Community: "I'm Coming Around to Seeing Ethics as Being Maybe as Important as Calculus".Science and engineering ethics · 2024Article
- Responsibility for the Environmental Impact of Data-Intensive Research: An Exploration of UK Health Researchers.Science and engineering ethics · 2024Article
- Vulnerability, social value and the equitable sharing of benefits from research: beyond the placebo and access debates.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Socially responsible science: Exploring the complexities.European journal for philosophy of science · 2023Article
- Facing the Pariah of Science: The Frankenstein Myth as a Social and Ethical Reference for Scientists.Science and engineering ethics · 2020Article
- Compliance with National Ethics Requirements for Human-Subject Research in Non-biomedical Sciences in Brazil: A Changing Culture?Science and engineering ethics · 2019Article
- Development of Oral Communication Skills by Undergraduates that Convey Evolutionary Concepts to the Public.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2017Article
- Are Leadership and Management Essential for Good Research? An Interview Study of Genetic Researchers.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2016Article
- Interdisciplinary Science and Yoga: The Challenges Ahead.International journal of yogaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of scientist carries an array of responsibilities. The most obvious is accurate and reliable research that can be depended upon by fellow researchers. Scientists also have a responsibility to oppose misuse or abuse in the application of research findings, and to attend to both the limitations and the foreseeable impacts of their work. In addition, as members of society, scientists have a responsibility to participate in discussions and decisions regarding the appropriate use of science in addressing societal issues and concerns, and to bring their specialized knowledge and expertise to activities and discussions that promote the education of students and fellow citizens, thereby enhancing and facilitating informed decision making and democracy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.