ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2014
A Modest Proposal to Move RCR Education Out of the Classroom and into Research.
Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deliberative Lab Communication and the Practice of Ethical Science.Science and engineering ethics · 2026Article
- Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- A randomized trial of a lab-embedded discourse intervention to improve research ethics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Intervention to Promote Responsible Conduct of Research Mentoring.Science and engineering ethics · 2018Article
- The Role of Culture and Acculturation in Researchers' Perceptions of Rules in Science.Science and engineering ethics · 2018Article
- Research Misconduct in the Croatian Scientific Community: A Survey Assessing the Forms and Characteristics of Research Misconduct.Science and engineering ethics · 2017Article
- Publishing, Objectivity, and Prestige.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2016Article
- Are Leadership and Management Essential for Good Research? An Interview Study of Genetic Researchers.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2016Article
- Making Professional Decisions in Research: Measurement and Key Predictors.Accountability in research · 2016Article
- Foreword.Accountability in research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Requirements for training in responsible conduct of research have significantly increased over the past 25 years, but worries about the integrity of science have only intensified. The approach to training has relied largely on short-term experiences, either online or in person. Even if done well, such strategies remain separate from, and a negligible fraction of, the practice of research. A proposed alternative is to empower faculty, postdoctoral fellows, and graduate student leaders to foster conversations about research ethics in the research environment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.