ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2015
Inferring single-cell gene expression mechanisms using stochastic simulation.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Incorporating spatial diffusion into models of bursty stochastic transcription.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
- Marker genes reveal dynamic features of cell evolving processes.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Transcriptional bursting dynamics in gene expression.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- Inferring transcriptional bursting kinetics from single-cell snapshot data using a generalized telegraph model.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- c-CSN: Single-cell RNA Sequencing Data Analysis by Conditional Cell-specific Network.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Enhancement of gene expression noise from transcription factor binding to genomic decoy sites.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Bayesian inference of distributed time delay in transcriptional and translational regulation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Constraining the complexity of promoter dynamics using fluctuations in gene expression.Physical biology · 2019Article
- Maximum Caliber Can Build and Infer Models of Oscillation in a Three-Gene Feedback Network.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2019Article
- Single-cell gene expression analysis reveals regulators of distinct cell subpopulations among developing human neurons.Genome research · 2017Article
- Effects of cell-cycle-dependent expression on random fluctuations in protein levels.Royal Society open science · 2016Article
- Intercellular Variability in Protein Levels from Stochastic Expression and Noisy Cell Cycle Processes.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Beta-Poisson model for single-cell RNA-seq data analyses.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
- Single-cell transcriptome sequencing: recent advances and remaining challenges.F1000Research · 2016Review
- Transcriptional Bursting in Gene Expression: Analytical Results for General Stochastic Models.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
motivationStochastic promoter switching between transcriptionally active (ON) and inactive (OFF) states is a major source of noise in gene expression. It is often implicitly assumed that transitions between promoter states are memoryless, i.e. promoters spend an exponentially distributed time interval in each of the two states. However, increasing evidence suggests that promoter ON/OFF times can be non-exponential, hinting at more complex transcriptional regulatory architectures. Given the essential role of gene expression in all cellular functions, efficient computational techniques for characterizing promoter architectures are critically needed.
resultsWe have developed a novel model reduction for promoters with arbitrary numbers of ON and OFF states, allowing us to approximate complex promoter switching behavior with Weibull-distributed ON/OFF times. Using this model reduction, we created bursty Monte Carlo expectation-maximization with modified cross-entropy method ('bursty MCEM(2)'), an efficient parameter estimation and model selection technique for inferring the number and configuration of promoter states from single-cell gene expression data. Application of bursty MCEM(2) to data from the endogenous mouse glutaminase promoter reveals nearly deterministic promoter OFF times, consistent with a multi-step activation mechanism consisting of 10 or more inactive states. Our novel approach to modeling promoter fluctuations together with bursty MCEM(2) provides powerful tools for characterizing transcriptional bursting across genes under different environmental conditions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: R source code implementing bursty MCEM(2) is available upon request. CONTACT: absingh@udel.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.