Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25573722›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2015

Psychological distress, quality of life, symptoms and unmet needs of colorectal cancer survivors near the end of treatment.

Lahiru Russell, Karla Gough, Allison Drosdowsky, Penelope Schofield, Sanchia Aranda, Phyllis N Butow, Jennifer A Westwood, Mei Krishnasamy, Jane M Young, Jo Phipps-Nelson and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Implementing a cognitive behavioral intervention for patients with head and neck cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Whether preferences of gastric cancer patients after surgery for follow-up change over time? Analysis based on discrete choice experiment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Colorectal cancer survival: prevalence of psychosocial distress and unmet supportive care needs.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  20. Preferences of gastric cancer survivors for follow-up care-a multicenter discrete choice experiment study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lahiru RussellDepartment of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia.
Karla Gough
Allison Drosdowsky
Penelope Schofield
Sanchia Aranda
Phyllis N Butow
Jennifer A Westwood
Mei Krishnasamy
Jane M Young
Jo Phipps-Nelson
Dorothy King
Michael Jefford
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUMelbourne Health · AUSydney South West Area Health Service · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study investigated psychological morbidity, quality of life (QoL), colorectal cancer (CRC)-specific symptoms and supportive care needs in a CRC population at the end of treatment (EOT).

methodsCRC survivors (n = 152) completed a post-treatment baseline questionnaire as part of a multisite supportive care randomised controlled trial (SurvivorCare). CRC survivors had completed treatment with curative intent within 0 to 6 months. Measures are as follows: Brief Symptom Inventory 18 (BSI-18) (psychological morbidity), EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 (QoL and CRC-specific symptoms and problems) and Cancer Survivors' Unmet Needs (CaSUN) measure with a simplified response format (unmet needs). Linear regression models were used to compare participants' QoL with a general population sample. Correlation analysis examined associations between psychological morbidity, QoL and CRC-specific symptoms and problems.

resultsAverage participant age was 64 years, and 51% were male. The majority (68%) had stage 3 disease. In comparison to population norms, CRC survivors had lower depression and anxiety scores (47.4 and 45.6, respectively) but higher somatisation, and lower role, cognitive and social functioning (p < 0.001). CRC survivors had higher fatigue, nausea/vomiting, appetite loss, diarrhoea and financial problems (all p < 0.001), as well as pain (p = 0.002) and constipation (p = 0.019). CRC-specific psychological scores were positively correlated with all three BSI domain scores, and pain and fatigue symptom scores on the QLQ-C30 while negatively correlated with all five functional scales of the QLQ-C30.

conclusionsCRC survivors reported good mental health at EOT. Role and social functioning were impaired compared to population norms, possibly related to physical symptoms. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Findings may help guide consultations with patients and inform the design of more tailored supportive care interventions.

trial registrationACTRN12610000207011.

Indexed as

AgedColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID25573722
OpenAlexW2052291472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.