Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25573631›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2015

FDG PET/CT imaging as a biomarker in lymphoma.

Michel Meignan, Emmanuel Itti, Andrea Gallamini, Anas Younes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. International Working Group consensus response evaluation criteria in lymphoma (RECIL 2017).Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2017
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Analysis of Positive Results ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Prognostic Value of 2-Deoxy-2-[Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michel MeignanLYSA Imaging, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Paris-Est Créteil University, Créteil, 94010, France, michel.meignan@hmn.aphp.fr.
Emmanuel Itti
Andrea Gallamini
Anas Younes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

FDG PET/CT has changed the management of FDG-avid lymphoma and is now recommended as the imaging technique of choice for staging and restaging. The need for tailoring therapy to reduce toxicity in patients with a favourable outcome and for improving treatment in those with high-risk factors requires accurate diagnostic methods and a new prognostic algorithm to identify different risk categories. New drugs are used in relapsed/refractory patients. The role of FDG PET/CT as a biomarker in this context is summarized in this review. New trends in FDG metabolic imaging in lymphoma are addressed including metabolic tumour volume measurement at staging and integrative PET which combines PET data with clinical and molecular markers or other imaging techniques. The quantitative approach for response assessment which is under investigation and is used in large ongoing trials is compared with visual criteria. The place of FDG in the era of targeted therapy is discussed.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Multimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnimalsHumansLymphomaFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.