Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25573522›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2015

An emerging evidence base for PET-CT in the management of childhood rhabdomyosarcoma: systematic review.

Gill Norman, Debra Fayter, Kate Lewis-Light, Julia Chisholm, Kieran McHugh, Daniel Levine, Meriel Jenney, Henry Mandeville, Suzanne Gatz, Bob Phillips

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Utilizing [Cancers · 2026
    Article
  5. CAR-T cell immunotherapy in rhabdomyosarcoma.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cancer innovation · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Clinical Perspectives forMetabolites · 2022
    Review
  20. GEIS-SEHOP clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gill NormanCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, North Yorkshire, UK.
Debra FayterCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, North Yorkshire, UK.
Kate Lewis-LightCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, North Yorkshire, UK.
Julia ChisholmRoyal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Kieran McHughGreat Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
Daniel LevineRoyal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Meriel JenneyChildren's Hospital for Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Henry MandevilleRoyal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Suzanne GatzRoyal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Bob PhillipsCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, North Yorkshire, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) management depends on risk stratification at diagnosis and treatment response. Assessment methods include CT, MRI, bone scintigraphy, histological analysis and bone marrow biopsy. Advanced functional imaging (FI) has potential to improve staging accuracy and management strategies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO 2013:CRD42013006128) of diagnostic accuracy and clinical effectiveness of FI in histologically proven paediatric RMS. PRISMA guidance was followed. We searched 10 databases to November 2013. Studies with ≥10 patients with RMS which compared positron emission tomography (PET), PET-CT or diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI to conventional imaging at any treatment stage were included. Study quality was assessed. Limited, heterogeneous effectiveness data required narrative synthesis, illustrated by plotting sensitivity and specificity in receiver operating curve (ROC) space.

resultsEight studies (six PET-CT, two PET) with 272 RMS patients in total were included. No DWI-MRI studies met inclusion criteria. Pooled estimates were not calculated due to sparseness of data. Limited evidence indicated initial PET-CT results were predictive of survival. PET-CT changed management of 7/40 patients. Nodal involvement PET-CT: sensitivity ranged from 80% to 100%; specificity from 89% to 100%. Distant metastatic involvement: PET-CT sensitivity ranged from 95% to 100%; specificity from 80% to100%. Data on metastases in different sites were sparse. Limited data were found on outcome prediction by PET-CT response. DISSEMINATION AND ETHICS: PET/PET-CT may increase initial staging accuracy in paediatric RMS, specifically in the detection of nodal involvement and distant metastatic spread. There is a need to further assess PET-CT for this population, ideally in a representative, unbiased and transparently selected cohort of patients.

Indexed as

ChildDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEvidence-Based MedicineHumansNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsRhabdomyosarcomaSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID25573522
PMCPMC4289735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.