Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25573516›Full record

ReviewAdvances in chronic kidney disease2015

Reducing CKD risks among vulnerable populations in primary care.

Raquel Greer, L Ebony Boulware

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in chronic kidney disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Inequities in kidney health and kidney care.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2023
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Disparities in Electronic Health Record Patient Portal Use in Nephrology Clinics.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raquel GreerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. Electronic address: rfcharle@jhmi.edu.
L Ebony BoulwareDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Duke CTSA (Composite)UL1TR001117 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E, LI, JENNIFER S · 2013 to 2017
$41.3M
Improving Primary Care to Narrow Racial Disparities in Chronic Kidney DiseaseK23DK094975 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GREER, RAQUEL CHARLES · 2012 to 2015
$722k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001117NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK094975NIDDK NIH HHS K23DK094975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethnic/racial and socioeconomic status disparities in the health-care and clinical outcomes of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are pervasive. The vast majority of care to decrease incidence of CKD risk and progression occurs in primary care settings. High-quality primary care, therefore, represents a key strategy through which disparities in the incidence and progression of CKD may be eliminated. The Chronic Care Model provides a framework for the delivery of high-quality primary care for chronic diseases, and it is frequently used to guide health-care quality improvement initiatives. Evidence suggests that Chronic Care Model constructs, including provider and organizational quality improvement initiatives focused on team approaches to chronic care (eg, case management, community health workers), are effective in modifying patients' CKD risks among ethnic minority and low-income patients. Other Chronic Care Model constructs, including clinical information systems (eg, disease registries), decision support interventions, and the provision of patient-centered care have been shown to improve processes related to CKD care but with limited and/or mixed effects on patient outcomes. Few studies have examined the effect of these approaches on reducing disparities. Research is needed to examine the effectiveness of these strategies to eliminate CKD disparities among vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesQuality ImprovementVulnerable PopulationsDisease ProgressionHumansIncidenceModels, OrganizationalPreventive Health ServicesPrimary Health CareRenal Insufficiency, ChronicSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesChronic kidney diseaseHealth-care disparitiesPrimary careQuality improvementSocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID25573516
PMCPMC4291538
OpenAlexW2090119068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.