Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25573276›Full record

ArticleGlycobiology2015

Identification of a fourth mannose 6-phosphate binding site in the cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor.

Linda J Olson, Alicia C Castonguay, Yi Lasanajak, Francis C Peterson, Richard D Cummings, David F Smith, Nancy M Dahms

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Glycobiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. StaufenC facilitates utilization of the ERAD pathway to transport dsRNA through the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytosol.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. The host mannose-6-phosphate pathway and viral infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Lysosomal and vacuolar sorting: not so different after all!Biochemical Society transactions · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linda J OlsonDepartment of Biochemistry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Alicia C CastonguayDepartment of Biochemistry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Yi LasanajakNational Center for Functional Glycomics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Francis C PetersonDepartment of Biochemistry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Richard D CummingsNational Center for Functional Glycomics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
David F SmithNational Center for Functional Glycomics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Nancy M DahmsDepartment of Biochemistry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA ndahms@mcw.edu.
Medical College of Wisconsin · USEmory University · US

Funding

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE MANNOSE 6-PHOSPHATE RECEPTORSR01DK042667 · NIDDK · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI DAHMS, NANCY M. · 1997 to 2023
$9.8M
Overall Priority Score P41GM103694 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CUMMINGS, RICHARD D · 2013 to 2018
$6.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK042667NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK042667NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103694NIGMS NIH HHS P41GM103694NIGMS NIH HHS P41GM10394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 300 kDa cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor (CI-MPR) plays an essential role in lysosome biogenesis by targeting ∼ 60 different phosphomannosyl-containing acid hydrolases to the lysosome. This type I membrane glycoprotein has a large extracellular region comprised of 15 homologous domains. Two mannose 6-phosphate (M6P) binding sites have been mapped to domains 3 and 9, whereas domain 5 binds preferentially to the phosphodiester, M6P-N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc). A structure-based sequence alignment predicts that the C-terminal domain 15 contains three out of the four conserved residues identified as essential for carbohydrate recognition by domains 3, 5 and 9 of the CI-MPR, but lacks two cysteine residues that are predicted to form a disulfide bond. To determine whether domain 15 of the CI-MPR has lectin activity and to probe its carbohydrate-binding specificity, truncated forms of the CI-MPR were tested for binding to acid hydrolases with defined N-glycans in surface plasmon resonance analyses, and used to interrogate a phosphorylated glycan microarray. The results show that a construct encoding domains 14-15 binds both M6P and M6P-GlcNAc with similar affinity (Kd = 13 and 17 μM, respectively). Site-directed mutagenesis studies demonstrate the essential role of the conserved Tyr residue in domain 15 for phosphomannosyl binding. A structural model of domain 15 was generated that predicted an Arg residue to be in the binding pocket and mutagenesis studies confirmed its important role in carbohydrate binding. Together, these results show that the CI-MPR contains a fourth carbohydrate-recognition site capable of binding both phosphomonoesters and phosphodiesters.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesCationsCattleHydrolasesMannosephosphatesMicroarray AnalysisModels, MolecularReceptor, IGF Type 2Surface Plasmon ResonanceCationsHydrolasesMannosephosphatesReceptor, IGF Type 2glycan microarraylectinlysosomal enzymeslysosomemannose 6-phosphate receptor

Identifiers

PMID25573276
PMCPMC4410830
OpenAlexW2329967285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.