ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology2015
Distinct afferent innervation patterns within the human proximal and distal esophageal mucosa.
Article in American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Elicitation of the Swallowing Reflex by Esophageal Stimulation in Healthy Subjects: An Evaluation Using High-Resolution Manometry.Dysphagia · 2020Trial
- Esophageal mucosal integrity improves after laparoscopic antireflux surgery in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Trial
- Esophageal peristalsis in health and disease: mechanistic insights.Physiological reviews · 2026Review
- Cellular and molecular dysregulation of the esophageal epithelium in systemic sclerosis.JCI insight · 2026Article
- The oesophagus as an immune organ.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025Review
- Esophageal Infusion of Menthol Does Not Affect Esophageal Motility in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.Dysphagia · 2024Article
- Pathophysiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: implications for diagnosis and management.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024Review
- A scientometrics analysis and visualization of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Esophageal Reflux Hypersensitivity: A Comprehensive Review.Gut and liver · 2023Review
- Sensory Phenotype of the Oesophageal Mucosa in Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Clinical relevance of salivary pepsin detection in diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease subtypes.Gastroenterology report · 2023Article
- Host-Microbiota Interactions in the Esophagus During Homeostasis and Allergic Inflammation.Gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Reflux characteristics triggering post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) in patients with GERD symptoms.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2022Article
- Post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW): physiology, triggering factors and role in reflux clearance in healthy subjects.Journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Vagus Nerves Provide a Robust Afferent Innervation of the Mucosa Throughout the Body of the Esophagus in the Mouse.Dysphagia · 2020Article
- Low-Cost Method and Biochip for Measuring the Trans-Epithelial Electrical Resistance (TEER) of Esophageal Epithelium.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Neuronal Control of Esophageal Peristalsis and Its Role in Esophageal Disease.Current gastroenterology reports · 2019Review
- Ineffective esophageal motility: Concepts, future directions, and conclusions from the Stanford 2018 symposium.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2019Review
- Revisiting Montreal: New Insights into Symptoms and Their Causes, and Implications for the Future of GERD.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2019Review
- Chronic Cough Is Associated With Long Breaks in Esophageal Peristaltic Integrity on High-resolution Manometry.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Little is known about the mucosal phenotype of the proximal human esophagus. There is evidence to suggest that the proximal esophagus is more sensitive to chemical and mechanical stimulation compared with the distal. This may have physiological relevance (e.g., in prevention of aspiration of gastroesophageal refluxate), but also pathological relevance (e.g., in reflux perception or dysphagia). Reasons for this increased sensitivity are unclear but may include impairment in mucosal barrier integrity or changes in sensory innervation. We assessed mucosal barrier integrity and afferent nerve distribution in the proximal and distal esophagus of healthy human volunteers. In 10 healthy volunteers baseline proximal and distal esophageal impedance was measured in vivo. Esophageal mucosal biopsies from the distal and proximal esophagus were taken, and baseline transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) was measured in Ussing chambers. Biopsies were examined immunohistochemically for presence and location of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-immunoreactive nerve fibers. In a further four healthy volunteers we investigated for colocalization of CGRP and protein gene product (PGP) 9.5 immunoreactivity in nerve fibers. Baseline impedance was higher in the proximal than in the distal esophagus [2,936 Ω (SD578) vs. 2,229 Ω (SD821); P = 0.03], however, baseline TER was not significantly different between them. Mucosal CGRP-immunoreactive nerves were found in the epithelium of both proximal and distal esophagus, but were located more superficially in the proximal mucosa compared with the distal [11.5 (SD7) vs. 21.7 (SD5) cell layers from lumen, P = 0.002] 19% of proximal, and 10% of distal mucosal PGP-immunoreactive fibers colocalized with CGRP. PGP-immunoreactive fibers were also significantly closer to the luminal surface in the proximal compared with the distal esophagus (P < 0.001). We conclude that mucosal barrier integrity is similar in proximal and distal esophagus, but proximal mucosal afferent nerves are in a more superficial location. The enhanced sensitivity to reflux-evoked symptoms of the proximal esophagus most likely has an anatomical basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.