Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25573174›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology2015

Distinct afferent innervation patterns within the human proximal and distal esophageal mucosa.

Philip Woodland, Rubina Aktar, Engelbert Mthunzi, Chung Lee, Madusha Peiris, Sean L Preston, L Ashley Blackshaw, Daniel Sifrim

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The oesophagus as an immune organ.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philip WoodlandBarts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Rubina AktarBarts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Engelbert MthunziBarts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Chung LeeBarts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Madusha PeirisBarts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Sean L PrestonBarts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
L Ashley BlackshawBarts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1565-0850
Daniel SifrimBarts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom d.sifrim@qmul.ac.uk.
Queen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0802313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the mucosal phenotype of the proximal human esophagus. There is evidence to suggest that the proximal esophagus is more sensitive to chemical and mechanical stimulation compared with the distal. This may have physiological relevance (e.g., in prevention of aspiration of gastroesophageal refluxate), but also pathological relevance (e.g., in reflux perception or dysphagia). Reasons for this increased sensitivity are unclear but may include impairment in mucosal barrier integrity or changes in sensory innervation. We assessed mucosal barrier integrity and afferent nerve distribution in the proximal and distal esophagus of healthy human volunteers. In 10 healthy volunteers baseline proximal and distal esophageal impedance was measured in vivo. Esophageal mucosal biopsies from the distal and proximal esophagus were taken, and baseline transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) was measured in Ussing chambers. Biopsies were examined immunohistochemically for presence and location of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-immunoreactive nerve fibers. In a further four healthy volunteers we investigated for colocalization of CGRP and protein gene product (PGP) 9.5 immunoreactivity in nerve fibers. Baseline impedance was higher in the proximal than in the distal esophagus [2,936 Ω (SD578) vs. 2,229 Ω (SD821); P = 0.03], however, baseline TER was not significantly different between them. Mucosal CGRP-immunoreactive nerves were found in the epithelium of both proximal and distal esophagus, but were located more superficially in the proximal mucosa compared with the distal [11.5 (SD7) vs. 21.7 (SD5) cell layers from lumen, P = 0.002] 19% of proximal, and 10% of distal mucosal PGP-immunoreactive fibers colocalized with CGRP. PGP-immunoreactive fibers were also significantly closer to the luminal surface in the proximal compared with the distal esophagus (P < 0.001). We conclude that mucosal barrier integrity is similar in proximal and distal esophagus, but proximal mucosal afferent nerves are in a more superficial location. The enhanced sensitivity to reflux-evoked symptoms of the proximal esophagus most likely has an anatomical basis.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideElectric ImpedanceEsophagusHealthy VolunteersHumansMucous MembraneNeurons, AfferentPermeabilitySensationSignal TransductionUbiquitin ThiolesteraseYoung AdultBiomarkersCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideUbiquitin ThiolesteraseUCHL1 protein, humanafferent neuronsgastroesophageal refluximpedancemucosal integrityperipheral sensitization

Identifiers

PMID25573174
PMCPMC4360043
OpenAlexW2171891404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.