Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25573046›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of investigative dermatology2015

KIT in melanoma: many shades of gray.

Ana Slipicevic, Meenhard Herlyn

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of investigative dermatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Mastocytosis and Skin Cancer: The Current State of Knowledge.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Autocrine/Paracrine Loop Between SCFFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Overcoming Immune Evasion in Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  14. Current Molecular Markers of Melanoma and Treatment Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ana SlipicevicMolecular and Cellular Oncogenesis, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: ASlipicevic@Wistar.org.
Meenhard HerlynMolecular and Cellular Oncogenesis, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
The Wistar Institute · US

Funding

Tumor Microenvironment and MetastasisP30CA010815 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI Luis J Montaner · 1985 to 2026
$75.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA010815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activating mutations in KIT have been identified in melanomas of acral and mucosal types and in those arising in chronically sun-damaged skin. Until now, KIT has been considered an oncogenic driver and a potential therapeutic target. However, data presented by Dhal et al. show that in cutaneous melanomas the KIT promoter is a target for hypermethylation, leading to its downregulation. Their observations suggest that signaling pathways downstream of KIT may have distinct and opposing roles in the pathogenesis of melanoma subtypes. This will have important implications for the use of KIT inhibitors in treating melanomas.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticHumansMelanomaProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitSkin NeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit

Identifiers

PMID25573046
PMCPMC4669950
OpenAlexW2063717508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.