Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25572946›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2015

Carotid plaque characterization using 3D T1-weighted MR imaging with histopathologic validation: a comparison with 2D technique.

S Narumi, M Sasaki, T Natori, M Yamaguchi Oura, K Ogasawara, M Kobayashi, Y Sato, Y Ogasawara, J Hitomi, Y Terayama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

S NarumiFrom the Departments of Neurology and Gerontology (S.N., T.N., M.Y.O., Y.T.) snarumi@iwate-med.ac.jp.
M SasakiInstitute for Biomedical Sciences (M.S.), Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan.
T NatoriFrom the Departments of Neurology and Gerontology (S.N., T.N., M.Y.O., Y.T.).
M Yamaguchi OuraFrom the Departments of Neurology and Gerontology (S.N., T.N., M.Y.O., Y.T.).
K OgasawaraNeurosurgery (K.O., M.K., Y.S., Y.O.).
M KobayashiNeurosurgery (K.O., M.K., Y.S., Y.O.).
Y SatoNeurosurgery (K.O., M.K., Y.S., Y.O.).
Y OgasawaraNeurosurgery (K.O., M.K., Y.S., Y.O.).
J HitomiAnatomy (J.H.).
Y TerayamaFrom the Departments of Neurology and Gerontology (S.N., T.N., M.Y.O., Y.T.).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purpose3D FSE T1WI has recently been used for carotid plaque imaging, given the potential advantages in contrast and spatial resolutions. However, its diagnostic performance remains unclear. Hence, we compared the ability of this technique to readily assess plaque characteristics with that of conventional images and validated the results with histologic classification. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe prospectively examined 34 patients with carotid stenosis who underwent carotid endarterectomy by using 1.5T scanners and obtained 3D-FSE T1WI and 2D spin-echo T1WI scans. After generating reformatted images obtained from the 3D-FSE T1-weighted images, we calculated the contrast ratios for the plaques and the adjacent muscles and compared these findings with the pathologic classifications.

resultsCarotid plaques were histologically classified as types VII, VIII, IV-V, or VI. With 3D-FSE T1WI, the range of contrast ratios for each classification was the following: 0.94-0.97 (median, 0.95), 0.95-1.29 (median, 1.10), 1.33-1.54 (median, 1.42), and 1.53-2.12 (median, 1.80), respectively. With 2D imaging, the range of contrast ratios for each classification was the following: 0.79-1.02 (median, 0.90), 0.88-1.19 (median, 1.01), 1.17-1.46 (median, 1.23), and 1.55-2.51 (median, 2.07), respectively. Results were significantly different among the 4 groups (P < .001). Sensitivity and specificity for discriminating vulnerable plaques (IV-VI) from stable plaques (VII, VIII) were both 100% for the 3D technique and 100% and 91%, respectively, for the 2D technique.

conclusions3D-FSE T1WI accurately characterizes intraplaque components of the carotid artery, with excellent sensitivity and specificity compared with those of 2D-T1WI.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCarotid ArteriesFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPlaque, AtheroscleroticSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID25572946
PMCPMC7964325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.