Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25572811›Full record

SynthesisMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2015

Prognostic factors for survival with bevacizumab-based therapy in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and pooled analysis of 11,585 patients.

Fausto Petrelli, Andrea Coinu, Mary Cabiddu, Karen Borgonovo, Veronica Lonati, Mara Ghilardi, Sandro Barni

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Colorectal cancer metastatic to the brain: analysis of prognostic factors and impact of KRAS mutations on presentation and outcome.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fausto PetrelliDepartment of Oncology, Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Treviglio, Treviglio, BG, Italy, faupe@libero.it.
Andrea Coinu
Mary Cabiddu
Karen Borgonovo
Veronica Lonati
Mara Ghilardi
Sandro Barni

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

First-line chemotherapy + bevacizumab (BEV) is one of the standards of care in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Contrary to anti-EGFR agents, it is currently not possible to identify the ideal candidate for BEV-based chemotherapy due to the lack of predictors of outcomes. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of risk factors for survival after B-based chemotherapy for CRC. We performed a meta-analysis by searching on the databases PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and SCOPUS for a published series that focused on prognostic factors for BEV-based therapy in advanced CRC. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) were calculated by using a random-effects model for parameters that could be considered as potential prognostic factors in ≥3 papers. Twenty-nine studies, which included a total of 11,585 patients, were considered in this analysis. Five parameters were associated with survival in ≥3 papers: (1) a longer progression-free interval [PFS: HR 0.87, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.78-0.97; P = 0.01]; (2) a single site of metastases (HR 0.63, 95 % CI 0.56-0.71; P < 0.00001); (3) elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH: HR 2.08, 95 % CI 1.69-2.57; P < 0.00001); (4) KRAS mutation (HR 1.66, 95 % CI 1.36-2.03; P < 0.00001); and (5) poor performance status (PS: HR 1.99, 95 % CI 1.41-2.82; P < 0.0001). Clinical variables associated with prolonged survival, after first-line treatment with chemotherapy + BEV for metastatic CRC patients, included long PFS, low LDH levels, KRAS wild-type status, good PS and a single site of metastasis. They should be considered when stratifying patients for inclusion in randomized trials. Investigations into new prognostic factors based on tumor biology are needed and of high priority.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsBevacizumabColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalHumansPrognosisTreatment OutcomeAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsBevacizumab

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.