SynthesisMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2015
Prognostic factors for survival with bevacizumab-based therapy in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and pooled analysis of 11,585 patients.
Synthesis in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Bevacizumab and wound-healing complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Oncotarget · 2016Pooled it
- MMC/UFT/LV in refractory colorectal cancer: phase II study and analysis of predictive variables of progression.International journal of clinical oncology · 2018Trial
- The subgroups of the phase III RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo with best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2018Trial
- Cancer-derived inflammation is associated with bevacizumab resistance and inferior clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
- The prognostic importance of the global immune-nutrition-information index (GINI) in patients with Ras wild type metastatic colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prognostic value of gender and primary tumor location in metastatic colon cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2023Article
- Key Prognostic Factors Create a Composite Risk Score to Stratify Patients into High- and Low-Treatment Benefit Groups: A Multicenter, Retrospective Data Analysis of 84 Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Regorafenib as Part of the CORRECT and CONSIGN Trials.Oncology research and treatment · 2023Observational
- TAS-102 Monotherapy and Combination Therapy with Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2021Review
- Study of Ras Mutations' Prognostic Value in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: STORIA Analysis.Cancers · 2020Article
- Tumour vasculature immaturity, oxidative damage and systemic inflammation stratify survival of colorectal cancer patients on bevacizumab treatment.Oncotarget · 2018Article
- Glycolysis gene expression analysis and selective metabolic advantage in the clinical progression of colorectal cancer.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2017Article
- KRAS-mutation incidence and prognostic value are metastatic site-specific in lung adenocarcinoma: poor prognosis in patients with KRAS mutation and bone metastasis.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Colorectal cancer metastatic to the brain: analysis of prognostic factors and impact of KRAS mutations on presentation and outcome.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
First-line chemotherapy + bevacizumab (BEV) is one of the standards of care in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Contrary to anti-EGFR agents, it is currently not possible to identify the ideal candidate for BEV-based chemotherapy due to the lack of predictors of outcomes. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of risk factors for survival after B-based chemotherapy for CRC. We performed a meta-analysis by searching on the databases PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and SCOPUS for a published series that focused on prognostic factors for BEV-based therapy in advanced CRC. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) were calculated by using a random-effects model for parameters that could be considered as potential prognostic factors in ≥3 papers. Twenty-nine studies, which included a total of 11,585 patients, were considered in this analysis. Five parameters were associated with survival in ≥3 papers: (1) a longer progression-free interval [PFS: HR 0.87, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.78-0.97; P = 0.01]; (2) a single site of metastases (HR 0.63, 95 % CI 0.56-0.71; P < 0.00001); (3) elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH: HR 2.08, 95 % CI 1.69-2.57; P < 0.00001); (4) KRAS mutation (HR 1.66, 95 % CI 1.36-2.03; P < 0.00001); and (5) poor performance status (PS: HR 1.99, 95 % CI 1.41-2.82; P < 0.0001). Clinical variables associated with prolonged survival, after first-line treatment with chemotherapy + BEV for metastatic CRC patients, included long PFS, low LDH levels, KRAS wild-type status, good PS and a single site of metastasis. They should be considered when stratifying patients for inclusion in randomized trials. Investigations into new prognostic factors based on tumor biology are needed and of high priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25572811What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.