Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25572538›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2015

Spontaneous non-aortic retroperitoneal hemorrhage: etiology, imaging characterization and impact of MDCT on management. A multicentric study.

Oliviero Caleo, Giorgio Bocchini, Sonia Paoletta, Anna Maria Ierardi, Alessandra Scionti, Michele Tonerini, Franco Guida, Giacomo Sica, Alessandra Perillo, Gianpaolo Carrafiello and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Management of anticoagulant-related soft tissue bleeding].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Spontaneous retroperitoneal hematoma: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Errors in imaging patients in the emergency setting.The British journal of radiology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Oliviero CaleoDiagnostica per Immagini, USL2 Lucca, Presidio Ospedaliero San Luca, Via Guglielmo Lippi Francesconi, 55100, Lucca, Italy, olivierocaleo@hotmail.it.
Giorgio Bocchini
Sonia Paoletta
Anna Maria Ierardi
Alessandra Scionti
Michele Tonerini
Franco Guida
Giacomo Sica
Alessandra Perillo
Gianpaolo Carrafiello
Mariano Scaglione
Presidio Ospedaliero · ITVilla Pineta Hospital · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITUniversity of Insubria · ITAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this multicentric study is to assess the usefulness of multiphasic Computed tomography in the identification of spontaneous non-traumatic retroperitoneal hematoma (SRH) and its management, with references to the role of interventional radiology. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom January 2011 to June 2014, 27 patients with SRH were selected. Patients with aortic, traumatic, or iatrogenic source of bleeding were excluded. All the patients were studied with multiphasic MDCT after injection of intravenous contrast. Digital Subtraction angiography and percutaneous embolization treatment were performed.

resultsCT identified SRH in all cases (100%), showing the source of bleeding in 11 cases (40%) and pointing out the source of bleeding in 15 cases (55%). In one case (5%), the bleeding origin was recognized only at surgery as adrenal source. CT has identified a contrast medium extravasation in the arterial phase in 17 patients (63%), treated successfully by percutaneous embolization in 13 and by open-surgery in two cases. Two patients died before undergoing intervention and surgery, respectively. Ten patients (37%) were non-operatively treated successfully with clinical, laboratory, and imaging follow-up.

conclusionsMultiphasic CT is the gold standard for the identification of a SRH. Recognition of CT signs of active bleeding is the crucial feature influencing the timing of therapeutic treatment. Urgent embolization should be performed in cases of arterial bleeding or contained vascular injuries supplying the retroperitoneal hematoma. Surgery is to be addressed in cases of actively bleeding hematomas associated with complication. Finally, an initial more conservative approach can be adopted in patients without signs of contrast extravasation or low-flow active bleeding. Technical skill, expertise, and recognition of CT signs of arterial active bleeding are critical features influencing patients management.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAngiography, Digital SubtractionContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialEmbolization, TherapeuticFemaleHemorrhageHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetroperitoneal SpaceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID25572538
OpenAlexW2066556904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.