Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25572480›Full record

ReviewImmunotherapy2015

Targeting CD4(+) T cells for the treatment of sarcoidosis: a promising strategy?

Lindsay J Celada, Wonder P Drake

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lindsay J CeladaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232-2363, USA.
Wonder P Drake
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

Microbial induction of sarcoidosis CD4+ T cell dysfunctionR01HL117074 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL, DRAKE, WONDER P. · 2013 to 2017
$3.8M
Mentoring in Translational Research in Interstitial Lung DiseasesK24HL127301 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Wonder P. Drake · 2016 to 2026
$1.2M
Investigation of microbial hetergeneity to sarcoidosis and AAT clinical outcomeU01HL112694 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DRAKE, WONDER P. · 2012 to 2014
$463k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL127301NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL117074NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL112694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sarcoidois is an inflammatory disease of unknown origin characterized by the abnormal accumulation of noncaseating granulomas at sites of disease activity in multiple organs throughout the body with a predilection for the lungs. Because the exact trigger that leads to disease activity is still under investigation, current treatment options are contingent on the organ or organs affected. Corticosteroids are the therapy of choice, but antimalarials and TNF-α antagonists are also commonly prescribed. Recent findings provide evidence for the use of CD20 B-cell-depleting therapy as an alternative method of choice. However, because sarcoidosis is predominantly a T-helper cell-driven disorder, an overwhelming amount of compelling evidence exists for the use of CD4(+) T-cell targeted therapy.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesAntimalarialsB-LymphocytesHumansLymphocyte DepletionSarcoidosisT-Lymphocytes, Helper-InducerTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAdrenal Cortex HormonesAntimalarialsTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaanti-CD20 therapycorticosteroidsgranulomasarcoidosisT helper cellsTNF-α antagonists

Identifiers

PMID25572480
PMCPMC5737958
OpenAlexW1999863939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.