Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25572462›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2016

Development and Evaluation of Patient Education Materials for Elderly Lung Cancer Patients.

Natalie Jewitt, Andrew J Hope, Robin Milne, Lisa W Le, Janet Papadakos, Nazek Abdelmutti, Pamela Catton, Meredith E Giuliani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natalie JewittRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Andrew J HopeRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Robin MilneRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lisa W LeDepartment of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Janet PapadakosPatient Education and Survivorship, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nazek AbdelmuttiELLICSR Wellness Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Pamela CattonRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Meredith E GiulianiRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. Meredith.Giuliani@rmp.uhn.on.ca.
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients treated for lung cancer are often elderly presenting a unique challenge for developing patient education materials. This study developed and evaluated a patient education pamphlet on lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) designed specifically for an elderly population. The SBRT pamphlet was developed using a participatory design involving a convenience sample of patients. This prospective study assessed patient's opinions of pamphlet effectiveness through self-report questionnaires. The pamphlet was deemed "effective" if patients rated 16/18 evaluation statements as "strongly agree" or "agree." Demographic data and health literacy (Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine short-form (REALM-SF)) were also assessed. Patient opinion of pamphlet "effectiveness" was compared between patients with REALM-SF scores of 7 versus <7 using Fisher's exact test. The overall EQ-5D-5L score was compared for patients who did and did not find the pamphlet effective using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Thirty-seven patients participated. The median age was 76 years (range 56-93) and 22 patients (59 %) had ≤high school education. Most patients preferred to have verbal (65 %) or written (78 %) educational materials as opposed to online information or educational classes. Thirty-two patients (86 %) rated the pamphlet as effective. The proportion of patients who found the pamphlet effective was 85.7 versus 86.7 % (p = 1.00) in those with REALM 7 versus <7. The mean EQ-5D score was 67.5 (SD 19.1) versus 71.8 (SD 8.7) (p = 0.84) in those who found the pamphlet effective versus not. Participatory design is an effective method for developing education materials for challenging patient groups such as elderly patients. Despite advanced age and comorbidity, this patient group had adequate health literacy.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyPatient Education as TopicTeaching MaterialsAdenocarcinomaAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Large CellCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedHealth literacyLung cancerOlder adultsPatient educationStereotactic body radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID25572462
OpenAlexW2073188177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.