Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25572296›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2015

Autophagy and cell reprogramming.

Shuo Wang, Pengyan Xia, Markus Rehm, Zusen Fan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A cross-talk between p16High senescence and cellular reprogramming.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Autophagy-A Hidden but Important Actor on Oral Cancer Scene.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuo WangCAS Key Laboratory of Infection and Immunity, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Pengyan Xia
Markus Rehm
Zusen Fan
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNInstitute of Biophysics · CNRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved process that degrades cytoplasmic components, thus contributing to cell survival and tissue homeostasis. Recent studies have demonstrated that autophagy maintains stem cells in relatively undifferentiated states (stemness) and also contributes to differentiation processes. Autophagy likewise plays a crucial role in somatic cell reprogramming, a finely regulated process that resets differentiated cells to a pluripotent state and that requires comprehensive alterations in transcriptional activities and epigenetic signatures. Autophagy assists in manifesting the functional consequences that arise from these alterations by modifying cellular protein expression profiles. The role of autophagy appears to be particularly relevant for early phases of cell reprogramming during the generation of induced pluripotent stems cells (iPSCs). In this review, we provide an overview of the core molecular machinery that constitutes the autophagic degradation system, describe the roles of autophagy in maintenance, self-renewal, and differentiation of stem cells, and discuss the autophagic process and its regulation during cell reprogramming.

Indexed as

AutophagyCellular ReprogrammingAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID25572296
PMCPMC11113636
OpenAlexW2047597126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.