Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25572193›Full record

Trial reportMayo Clinic proceedings2015

Urine aquaporin 1 and perilipin 2 differentiate renal carcinomas from other imaged renal masses and bladder and prostate cancer.

Jeremiah J Morrissey, Jonathan Mobley, R Sherburne Figenshau, Joel Vetter, Sam Bhayani, Evan D Kharasch

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00851994 completednot on this map

Urine Proteome of Patients Undergoing Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2008 to 2016Enrolled274ConditionsSurgery
NCT05785052 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Biomarkers of Renal Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorBiorek S.R.L.Ran2019 to 2026Enrolled1,000ConditionsRenal Cell Carcinoma, Tumor, Solid, Oncocytoma, Angiomyolipoma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Value of Ferritin Heavy Chain (FTH1) Expression in Diagnosis and Prognosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Urine C-reactive protein content and non-invasive molecular grading of renal cell carcinoma.Kidney cancer journal : official journal of the Kidney Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Aquaporins in Urinary System.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Renal Cell Cancer and Obesity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeremiah J MorrisseyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Clinical and Translational Research, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO. Electronic address: morrisse@wustl.edu.
Jonathan MobleyDepartment of Urology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO.
R Sherburne FigenshauSiteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Department of Urology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO.
Joel VetterDepartment of Urology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO.
Sam BhayaniSiteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Department of Urology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO.
Evan D KharaschDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Clinical and Translational Research, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
URINARY BIOMARKERS OF RENAL CELL CARCINOMASR01CA141521 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRISSEY, JEREMIAH J · 2011 to 2019
$2.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCI NIH HHS R01 CA141521NCI NIH HHS R01CA141521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of urine aquaporin 1 (AQP1) and perilipin 2 (PLIN2) concentrations to diagnose clear cell or papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by comparing urine concentrations of these unique biomarkers in patients with RCC, noncancer renal masses, bladder cancer, and prostate cancer.

methodsFrom February 1, 2012, through October 31, 2012, preoperative urine samples were obtained from patients with a presumptive diagnosis of RCC based on an imaged renal mass, prostate cancer, or transitional cell bladder cancer. Imaged renal masses were diagnosed postnephrectomy—as malignant or benign—by histology. Urine AQP1 and PLIN2 concentrations were measured by using a sensitive and specific Western blot and normalized to urine creatinine concentration.

resultsMedian concentrations of urine AQP1 and PLIN2 in patients with clear cell and papillary RCC (n=47) were 29 and 36 relative absorbance units/mg urine creatinine, respectively. In contrast, median concentrations in patients with bladder cancer (n=22) and prostate cancer (n=27), patients with chromophobe tumors (n=7), and patients with benign renal oncocytomas (n=9) and angiomyolipomas (n=7) were all less than 10 relative absorbance units/mg urine creatinine (Kruskal-Wallis test, P<.001 vs RCC for both biomarkers) and comparable with those in healthy controls. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 0.99 to 1.00 for both biomarkers.

conclusionThese results support the specificity and sensitivity of urine AQP1 and PLIN2 concentrations for RCC. These novel tumor-specific proteins have high clinical validity and high potential as specific screening biomarkers for clear cell and papillary RCC as well as in the differential diagnosis of imaged renal masses.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00851994.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsAgedAquaporin 1Biomarkers, TumorDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansKidneyMaleMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedNephrectomyPatient Outcome AssessmentPerilipin-2Preoperative CareAquaporin 1Biomarkers, TumorMembrane ProteinsPerilipin-2PLIN2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25572193
PMCPMC4317334
OpenAlexW2032613519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.