ArticleJournal of neurology2015
Patient outcome in the Belgian medical need program on bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and efficacy of VB-111, an anticancer gene therapy, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: results of a phase I/II study.Neuro-oncology · 2020Trial
- Randomized phase II trial comparing axitinib with the combination of axitinib and lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2018Trial
- Randomized phase II study of axitinib versus physicians best alternative choice of therapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2016Trial
- Repeated responders to bevacizumab combination treatment in recurrent glioblastoma: a retrospective case study.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Intracranial administration of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 immune checkpoint-blocking monoclonal antibodies in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma.Neuro-oncology · 2024Article
- Efficacy of apatinib combined with temozolomide in the treatment of recurrent high‑grade glioma: A meta‑analysis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Article
- Intracerebral administration of CTLA-4 and PD-1 immune checkpoint blocking monoclonal antibodies in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a phase I clinical trial.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2021Article
- Angiotensinogen promoter methylation predicts bevacizumab treatment response of patients with recurrent glioblastoma.Molecular oncology · 2020Article
- Long-term survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab: a multicentric retrospective study.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2019Article
- Bevacizumab in temozolomide refractory high-grade gliomas: single-centre experience and review of the literature.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2018Article
- Bevacizumab for glioblastoma.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bevacizumab (BEV) has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGB). Given the unmet need for active therapeutic options in rGB patients, a medical need program was initiated by the Belgian competent authorities. Between November 2010 and February 2013, a total of 313 patients with rGB initiated treatment with BEV administered at a dose of 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. All patients had failed prior treatment with at least radiation therapy and temozolomide and the majority of patients (70 %) were treated with corticosteroids at baseline. Patients received a median of 6 BEV administrations (range 1-53). Overall, BEV was well tolerated. During BEV treatment the WHO-Performance Score (WHO-PS) improved in 59 patients (19 %) and stabilized for at least 6 weeks in an additional 139 (44 %) patients. Corticosteroid treatment could be stopped in 16 % or reduced in dose in 32 % of patients. The best objective tumor response rate using RANO criteria (investigator's assessment) was 3.5 % CR, 22 % PR, 38 % SD and 37 % PD. The median and 6-month PFS were 13 weeks (95 % CI 12.7-14) and 27.3 % (95 % CI 22.3-32.5), median and 6-month OS rates were 26 weeks (23-29) and 52 % (46.4-58.6), respectively. WHO-PS (0-1 vs. 2-3) and baseline steroid use were significantly correlated with PFS and OS. Our observations support the use of BEV as a monotherapy for patients with rGB who have no alternative treatment options. Optimal benefit from BEV treatment is likely to be obtained when treatment is initiated before the performance status deteriorates to two or less.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25572162What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.