Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25572005›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2015

Beyond traditional pharmacology: new tools and approaches.

E V Gurevich, V V Gurevich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Value drivers of development stage biopharma companies.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. RHAMM Is a Multifunctional Protein That Regulates Cancer Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Arrestin-mediated signaling: Is there a controversy?World journal of biological chemistry · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

E V GurevichDepartment of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
V V GurevichDepartment of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

STRUCTURE/FUNCTION STUDIES OF VISUAL ARRESTINR01EY011500 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI T M Iverson · 1997 to 2026
$12.3M
Arrestin interactions with non-receptor binding partnersR01GM077561 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GUREVICH, VSEVOLOD V. · 2007 to 2015
$2.3M
Signaling regulation in the striatum in Parkinson's diseaseR01NS065868 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GUREVICH, EUGENIA V · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
Dopamine Receptor Trafficking in Parkinson's DiseaseR01NS045117 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GUREVICH, EUGENIA V · 2003 to 2007
$1.6M
Regulation of GPCR signaling with receptor-specific arrestinsR01GM109955 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GUREVICH, VSEVOLOD V. · 2015 to 2017
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS EY011500NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011500NIGMS NIH HHS GM077561NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077561NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109955NINDS NIH HHS NS045117NINDS NIH HHS NS065868NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS045117NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional pharmacology is defined as the science that deals with drugs and their actions. While small molecule drugs have clear advantages, there are many cases where they have proved to be ineffective, prone to unacceptable side effects, or where due to a particular disease aetiology they cannot possibly be effective. A dominant feature of the small molecule drugs is their single mindedness: they provide either continuous inhibition or continuous activation of the target. Because of that, these drugs tend to engage compensatory mechanisms leading to drug tolerance, drug resistance or, in some cases, sensitization and consequent loss of therapeutic efficacy over time and/or unwanted side effects. Here we discuss new and emerging therapeutic tools and approaches that have potential for treating the majority of disorders for which small molecules are either failing or cannot be developed. These new tools include biologics, such as recombinant hormones and antibodies, as well as approaches involving gene transfer (gene therapy and genome editing) and the introduction of specially designed self-replicating cells. It is clear that no single method is going to be a 'silver bullet', but collectively, these novel approaches hold promise for curing practically every disorder.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological ProductsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyGenetic TherapyHumansPharmacologyProtein EngineeringSignal TransductionBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID25572005
PMCPMC4500362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.