Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25571966›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2015

Development and preliminary evaluation of a rehabilitation consult for survivors of head and neck cancer: an intervention mapping protocol.

Sara E McEwen, Aileen M Davis, Jennifer M Jones, Rosemary Martino, Ian Poon, Ana Maria Rodriguez, Jolie Ringash

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Voice rehabilitation after laryngeal cancer: Associated effects on psychological well-being.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. "I didn't actually know there was such a thing as rehab": survivor, family, and clinician perceptions of rehabilitation following treatment for head and neck cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Sara E McEwenSt. John's Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, 285 Cummer Avenue, Toronto, ON, M2M 2G1, Canada. sara.mcewen@utoronto.ca.
Aileen M DavisDepartment of Physical Therapy and Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Science, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada. adavis@uhnresearch.ca.
Jennifer M JonesCancer Survivorship Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada. jennifer.jones@uhn.ca.
Rosemary MartinoToronto Western Research Institute, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada. rosemary.martino@utoronto.ca.
Ian PoonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada. ian.poon@sunnybrook.ca.
Ana Maria RodriguezSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, 3654 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y5, Canada. ana.rodriguez@mail.mcgill.ca.
Jolie RingashDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. jolie.ringash@rmp.uhn.on.ca.
University of Toronto · CAMcGill University · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CASunnybrook Research InstituteUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence suggests that rehabilitation interventions can improve function and quality of life in survivors of head and neck cancer (HNC), but there is a lack of coordinated, integrated services, and those offered are inconsistent. To address these gaps, we will develop and conduct preliminary evaluation of a rehabilitation consult, built on the theoretical foundations of goal setting and self-management, and composed of a brief functional evaluation, a resource compendium, and collaborative goal-setting and action planning processes. METHODS/

designThe development of the rehabilitation consult will be guided by intervention mapping, which consists of six steps: 1. Needs assessment; 2. Definition of program objectives; 3. Selection of theory-based intervention methods; 4. Production and pretesting; 5. Adoption, implementation and sustainability planning; 6. Process and effect evaluation. Within the intervention mapping framework, an iterative process of constructing drafts and mini-evaluations with consumers and experts will be used, modifying the rehabilitation consult intervention until a version suitable for formal evaluation is established. The rehabilitation consult will then be evaluated using a prospective, mixed method, single group design with 30 survivors of head and neck cancer. Outcomes will be assessed pre- and post-intervention and at 6-month follow-up. DISCUSSION: Survivors of head and neck cancer have among the most complex rehabilitation needs of all cancer patients. The rehabilitation consult is expected to improve knowledge and uptake of rehabilitation resources and strategies in survivors of head and neck cancer and thereby improve long-term function and quality of life. If the rehabilitation consult is effective in cancer patients with such high and diverse needs, this project will produce a toolkit that will be adaptable for other types of cancer in other jurisdictions.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansNeeds AssessmentOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareProgram DevelopmentProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID25571966
PMCPMC4297361
OpenAlexW2129362861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.