ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology1989
Haematological recovery following high-dose cyclophosphamide with autologous bone marrow transplantation.
Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Green cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum Maton) and its combination with cyclophosphamide on Ehrlich solid tumors.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A total of 31 patients with previously untreated small-cell carcinoma of the lung were treated with very-high-dose cyclophosphamide, using autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) to assist haematological recovery. The period of neutropenia was shorter with 40 mg/kg cyclophosphamide x 4 (7 patients) than when the dose of cyclophosphamide was increased to 50 mg/kg x 4 (11 patients), despite ABMT 2 days after chemotherapy in each group. In all, 13 patients were treated with 50 mg/kg cyclophosphamide x 4, with infusion of bone marrow delayed to day 4, 6 or 8 after chemotherapy to determine the contribution of ABMT to haematological recovery. The period of neutropaenia was increased when marrow was returned 6 days following chemotherapy, confirming that ABMT contributed to haematological recovery after this schedule of treatment. A total of 11 patients had a second cycle of 50 mg/kg cyclophosphamide x 4 after recovery from the first cycle of high-dose chemotherapy. The period of myelosuppression was greater with the second cycle of chemotherapy, although ABMT was carried out during both cycles. The results show that ABMT contributes to haematological recovery when the dose of cyclophosphamide is high enough to produce prolonged hypoplasia. The increased myelosuppression observed after a second high-dose treatment in spite of ABMT suggests either that both transplanted and endogenous marrow activity contribute to recovery of myelopoiesis or that there is residual damage to marrow stroma after the first cycle of treatment. The data indicate the necessity of carefully assessing the role of ABMT in haematological recovery with high-dose chemotherapy regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.