Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25569634›Full record

ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2015

Feasibility and effectiveness of an asthma/COPD service for primary care: a cross-sectional baseline description and longitudinal results.

Esther I Metting, Roland A Riemersma, Janwillem H Kocks, Margriet G Piersma-Wichers, Robbert Sanderman, Thys van der Molen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Aeroallergen sensitization for detecting asthma in primary care: A diagnostic test accuracy study.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Esther I Metting1] Department of General Practice, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands [2] GRIAC Research Institute Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Roland A Riemersma1] Department of General Practice, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands [2] GRIAC Research Institute Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Janwillem H Kocks1] Department of General Practice, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands [2] GRIAC Research Institute Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Margriet G Piersma-WichersCerte Laboratories, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Robbert Sanderman1] Department of Health Psychology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands [2] Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Thys van der Molen1] Department of General Practice, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands [2] GRIAC Research Institute Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2007, an Asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (AC) service was implemented in the North of the Netherlands to support General Practitioners (GPs) by providing advice from pulmonologists on a systematic basis.

aimsTo evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of this service on patient-related outcomes.

methodsWe report baseline data on 11,401 patients and follow-up data from 2,556 patients. GPs can refer all patients with possible obstructive airway disease (OAD) to the service, which is conducted by the local laboratory. Patients are assessed in the laboratory using questionnaires and spirometry. Pulmonologists inspect the data through the internet and send the GP diagnosis and management advice.

resultsA total of 11,401 patients were assessed by the service, covering almost 60% of all adult patients with projected asthma or COPD in the area. In all, 46% (n = 5,268) of the patients were diagnosed with asthma, 18% (n = 2,019) with COPD and 7% (n = 788) with the overlap syndrome. A total of 740 (7%) patients were followed up after 3 months because the GP advised them to change medication. In this group, the proportion of unstable COPD patients (Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) ⩾ 1) decreased from 63% (n = 92) at baseline to 49% (n = 72). The proportion of patients with uncontrolled asthma (Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) ⩾ 1.5) decreased from 41% (n = 204) to 23% (n = 115). In all, 938 (8%) patients were followed up after 12 months. From these patients, the proportion of unstable COPD patients (CCQ ⩾ 1) decreased from 47% (n = 115) to 44% (n = 107). The proportion of patients with uncontrolled asthma (ACQ⩾1.5) decreased from 16% (n = 95) to 14% (n = 85).

conclusionThe AC service assessed a considerable proportion of patients with OAD in the area, improved patients' outcomes, and is considered to be feasible and effective.

Indexed as

AdultAsthmaCross-Sectional StudiesDisease ManagementFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPrimary Health CareProgram DevelopmentPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRespiratory Function TestsTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID25569634
PMCPMC4532146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.